Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Platt |
8 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gordon Doig |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
17 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Platt |
25 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
22 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
22 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
23 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Vickers |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
23 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
24 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-23 |
You can find further information about peer review here.