Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nadine Graham |
24 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
17 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jean-Pierre Raynauld |
20 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Beckwée |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
6 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Beckwée |
6 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
21 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - David Beckwée |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-21 |
You can find further information about peer review here.