Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
6 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
17 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
13 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
12 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
1 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Cyrus Cooper |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
1 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
7 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-13-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.