Skip to main content

Table 5 Changes in profile-specific assessments

From: Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial

Group Experimental group 1 N = 13 Experimental group 2 N = 12 Control group N = 14
  PRE Change
PRE to T1
Change
T1 to FU
PRE Change PRE to T1 Change
T1 to FU
PRE Change PRE to T1 Change
T1 to FU
Imaprax: visual (42)* 32.6 ± 3.8 0.6 ± 3.7 0.6 ± 2.4§ 32.1 ± 4.6 1.5 ± 1.8 -0.3 ± 1.8§ 31.5 ± 4.0 -0.4 ± 4.8 -1.0 ± 3.0§
BBS (56)* 52.5 ± 5.2 0.3 ± 1.7 0.2 ± 1.1 50.8 ± 4.0 1.0 ± 2.7 0.02 ± 2.5 46.9 ± 9.3 1.9 ± 3.0 0.2 ± 2.0
ABC-Scale (100)* 80.5 ± 20.4 0.9 ± 8.7 2.3 ± 6.2 72.4 ± 20.0 3.8 ± 6.1 4.5 ± 10.1 70.4 ± 22.5 3.0 ± 10.3 3.0 ± 9.0
Wellbeing (VAS, 10)* 2.6 ± 1.6 -0.1 ± 2.0 -0.7 ± 1.6 2.4 ± 1.3 0.1 ± 1.8 0.7 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 1.5 0.2 ± 1.7 -0.3 ± 1.6
  1. Numbers are listed as mean score ± 1 standard deviation.
  2. ABC Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
  3. BBS Berg Balance Scale
  4. FU Follow-up
  5. PRE Pre-intervention score (mean score from BL and T0)
  6. T1 Post-intervention score
  7. VAS Visual analogue scale
  8. * Maximal score
  9. § p < 0.001