Skip to main content

Table 5 Changes in profile-specific assessments

From: Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial

Group

Experimental group 1 N = 13

Experimental group 2 N = 12

Control group N = 14

 

PRE

Change

PRE to T1

Change

T1 to FU

PRE

Change PRE to T1

Change

T1 to FU

PRE

Change PRE to T1

Change

T1 to FU

Imaprax: visual (42)*

32.6 ± 3.8

0.6 ± 3.7

0.6 ± 2.4§

32.1 ± 4.6

1.5 ± 1.8

-0.3 ± 1.8§

31.5 ± 4.0

-0.4 ± 4.8

-1.0 ± 3.0§

BBS (56)*

52.5 ± 5.2

0.3 ± 1.7

0.2 ± 1.1

50.8 ± 4.0

1.0 ± 2.7

0.02 ± 2.5

46.9 ± 9.3

1.9 ± 3.0

0.2 ± 2.0

ABC-Scale (100)*

80.5 ± 20.4

0.9 ± 8.7

2.3 ± 6.2

72.4 ± 20.0

3.8 ± 6.1

4.5 ± 10.1

70.4 ± 22.5

3.0 ± 10.3

3.0 ± 9.0

Wellbeing (VAS, 10)*

2.6 ± 1.6

-0.1 ± 2.0

-0.7 ± 1.6

2.4 ± 1.3

0.1 ± 1.8

0.7 ± 1.2

2.1 ± 1.5

0.2 ± 1.7

-0.3 ± 1.6

  1. Numbers are listed as mean score ± 1 standard deviation.
  2. ABC Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
  3. BBS Berg Balance Scale
  4. FU Follow-up
  5. PRE Pre-intervention score (mean score from BL and T0)
  6. T1 Post-intervention score
  7. VAS Visual analogue scale
  8. * Maximal score
  9. § p < 0.001