Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
15 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard G Kyle |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
10 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrew Vickers |
17 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victoria Blinder |
17 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard G Kyle |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard G Kyle |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
29 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
30 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard G Kyle |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
30 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-89 |
You can find further information about peer review here.