Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: Are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study

Original Submission
15 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
24 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Gravel
28 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten
26 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Iosief Abraha
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Scholten
20 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Iosief Abraha
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
28 Feb 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2011 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-12-58

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page