Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
5 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Michael Ahrens |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Michael Ahrens |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
27 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Michael Ahrens |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Philip Michael Ahrens |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.