Peer Review reports
From: Comparisons against baseline within randomised groups are often used and can be highly misleading
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Friedman |
27 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andy Vail |
22 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Martin Bland |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - John Martin Bland |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Publishing | ||
22 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-264 |
You can find further information about peer review here.