Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
25 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Lacroix |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
24 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suresh Victor |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Lacroix |
6 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suresh Victor |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Suresh Victor |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
8 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
9 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jacques Lacroix |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
9 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
9 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-257 |
You can find further information about peer review here.