Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 12 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joshua Barzilay |
| 25 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Leo Timmers |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 26 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joshua Barzilay |
| 2 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Leo Timmers |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 2 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 8 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Leo Timmers |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 8 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 8 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Leo Timmers |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 8 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-240 |
You can find further information about peer review here.