Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rowan |
| 7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Houghton |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rowan |
| 25 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Houghton |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 8 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Houghton |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 8 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Rowan |
| 22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Houghton |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 23 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Houghton |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 23 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 5 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-218 |
You can find further information about peer review here.