Peer Review reports
From: Failure to report protocol violations in clinical trials: a threat to internal validity?
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean Bagshaw |
| 7 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 13 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christian Gluud |
| 19 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 19 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 26 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gordon Doig |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 26 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-214 |
You can find further information about peer review here.