Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
5 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - S M Marshall |
12 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijay Viswanathan |
2 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Janaka Karalliedde |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
2 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - S M Marshall |
17 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vijay Viswanathan |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
16 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Janaka Karalliedde |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
16 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
22 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Janaka Karalliedde |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
22 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 11 |
Publishing | ||
26 Sep 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Sep 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-209 |
You can find further information about peer review here.