Skip to main content

Table 2 Reporting of methodological aspect of included studies

From: Reporting of factorial trials of complex interventions in community settings: a systematic review

   

Year of Publication

2000-2003

2004-2009

Total

   

Number of Trials

27

49

76

Heading

Subheading

Methodological Descriptor

 

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

Frequency

Percent

Title and abstract

 

Phrase "factorial" used

No

2

(7)

4

(8)

6

(8)

   

Yes

25

(93)

45

(92)

70

(92)

Introduction

Background

Rationale for factorial trial established

Efficiency

3

(11)

4

(8)

7

(9)

   

Interaction

0

(0)

2

(4)

2

(3)

   

Both

4

(15)

3

(6)

7

(9)

   

Not stated

20

(74)

40

(82)

60

(79)

Methods

Design

Number of treatments

2 × 2

24

(89)

43

(88)

67

(88)

   

Other

3

(11)

6

(12)

9

(12)

 

Allocation

Units of allocation

Individual only

20

(74)

28

(57)

48

(63)

   

Cluster only

5

(19)

16

(33)

21

(28)

   

Mixed

2

(7)

5

(10)

7

(9)

  

Adequate description of randomisation (generation of sequence, execution)

No

12

(44)

24

(49)

36

(47)

   

Yes

15

(56)

25

(51)

40

(53)

  

Adequate allocation concealment

No

1

(4)

2

(4)

3

(4)

   

Yes

10

(37)

21

(43)

31

(41)

   

Unclear

16

(59)

26

(53)

42

(55)

 

Sample size

Sample size calculation given

No

10

(37)

13

(27)

23

(30)

   

Yes

17

(63)

36

(73)

53

(70)

  

If yes, estimates based on analysis:

At the margins

11

(65)

27

(75)

38

(71)

   

Interaction/Inside the table

1

(6)

4

(11)

5

(10)

   

Unclear/Inadequate

5

(29)

5

(14)

10

(19)

 

Statistical methods

Analytical approach

ITT

14

(52)

38

(78)

52

(68)

   

Not explicitly stated

13

(48)

11

(22)

24

(32)

  

Primary analysis correctly adjusted for design variables/baseline

No

2

(7)

2

(4)

4

(5)

   

Yes

22

(81)

39

(80)

61

(80)

   

Unclear

3

(11)

8

(16)

11

(15)

  

For cluster allocations, appropriate analysis used

No

2

(29)

3

(14)

5

(18)

   

Yes

5

(71)

17

(81)

22

(79)

   

Unclear

0

(0)

1

(5)

1

(4)

Results

Participant flow

Reported numbers randomly assigned and followed up

CONSORT diagram

15

(56)

33

(67)

48

(63)

   

No diagram but adequate text

3

(11)

2

(4)

5

(7)

   

Inadequate

9

(33)

14

(29)

23

(31)

 

Baseline characteristics

Baseline data reported in table for treatment groups

No

5

(19)

7

(14)

12

(16)

   

Yes

22

(81)

42

(86)

64

(84)

  

If yes, data reported:

At margins

3

(14)

10

(24)

13

(20)

   

Inside the table

17

(77)

29

(69)

46

(72)

   

Both

2

(9)

3

(7)

5

(8)

 

Primary analyses

Descriptive data provided at follow up (eg mean & SD, N & %)

No

2

(7)

7

(14)

9

(12)

   

Yes

25

(93)

42

(86)

67

(88)

  

If yes, data reported:

At margins

8

(32)

13

(31)

21

(31)

   

Inside the table

8

(32)

18

(43)

26

(39)

   

Both

9

(36)

11

(26)

20

(30)

  

Appropriate between-group estimate(s)

No

10

(37)

6

(12)

16

(21)

   

Yes

17

(63)

43

(88)

60

(79)

  

SE or 95% CI reported

No

12

(44)

11

(22)

23

(30)

   

Yes

15

(56)

38

(78)

53

(70)

 

Interaction

Results of interaction reported

No

7

(26)

16

(33)

23

(30)

   

Yes

20

(74)

33

(67)

53

(70)

  

If yes, level of detail reported:

No interaction found/p-value only

17

(85)

22

(67)

39

(74)

   

Interaction estimate & SE/CI/p-value

3

(15)

11

(33)

14

(26)

Discussion

Interaction

If interaction reported, was it discussed

No

10

(50)

11

(33)

21

(40)

   

Yes

10

(50)

22

(67)

32

(60)

 

Overall interpretation

Appropriate based on data presented

No

4

(15)

0

(0)

4

(5)

   

Yes

23

(85)

49

(100)

72

(95)