Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 21 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 21 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keren fisher |
| 23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 25 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 30 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keren fisher |
| 6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst |
| 11 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 16 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 16 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
| 24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-146 |
You can find further information about peer review here.