Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
21 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
21 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keren fisher |
23 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - keren fisher |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst |
11 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
16 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
16 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Tae-Hun Kim |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-146 |
You can find further information about peer review here.