Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
26 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Clegg |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlie Goldsmith |
25 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Clegg |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Clegg |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
8 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Clegg |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
8 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
8 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-143 |
You can find further information about peer review here.