Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
26 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janice Pogue |
28 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gladys McPherson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
21 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Tolmie |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Tolmie |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
4 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Tolmie |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
4 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
6 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
6 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-12-112 |
You can find further information about peer review here.