Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 10 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Elbourne |
| 11 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Hugh Ford |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 11 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Elbourne |
| 21 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Hugh Ford |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 22 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Hugh Ford |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 22 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 25 Jan 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Jan 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-11-8 |
You can find further information about peer review here.