Skip to main content

Table 2 Criteria for assessing the quality of reporting of abstracts of RCTs in TCM

From: Quality of reporting of trial abstracts needs to be improved: using the CONSORT for abstracts to assess the four leading Chinese medical journals of traditional Chinese medicine

Items

Criteria for judgment

No. of abstracts reporting each item (n = 345)

  

Chinese (%)

English (%)

General items

   

Title

Mentioned randomized or randomly allocation in the title

28(8)

25(7)

Authors

Reported the contact details of corresponding author, e.g. postal address, email

344(99)

344(99)

Trial design

Described as "parallel group", "cluster randomized", "crossover", etc.

7(2)

5(1)

Trial registration

Reported the trial registration number and name of trial register

0(0)

0(0)

Funding

Reported the source of funding for the trial

93(27)

0(0)

Methods

   

Participants

Reported the details of the participants (included the demography, diagnosis, TCM syndrome)

234(68)

239(69)

Interventions

Reported the details of the interventions for experimental group (included denomination, usage and course of treatment)

163(47)

152(44)

 

Reported the details of the interventions for control group (included denomination, usage and course of treatment)

179(52)

168(49)

Objective

Described as "to compare interventions(A) and (B) in patients with condition(C)"

48(14)

44(13)

Outcome

Defined the primary outcome

11(3)

10(3)

Randomization

Reported the method of random sequence generation

17(5)

14(4)

 

Mentioned the allocation concealment (such as central randomization by telephone)

0(0)

0(0)

Blinding

Specified exactly who was blinded

1(0.3)

0(0)

 

Simply mentioned the trial as "single blind", or "double blind"

39(11)

39(11)

Results

   

Numbers randomized

Reported the number of participants randomized to each group

253(73)

253(73)

Numbers analyzed

Reported the number of participants included in analysis for each group

13(4)

12(4)

Outcomes

Reported the result for each group (if the primary outcome not defined, reported the result of one listed outcome)

195(57)

190(55)

 

Reported effect size, precision for the difference between groups

2(1)

2(1)

Harms

Reported important adverse events or side effects

50(15)

48(14)

Conclusions

   
 

Clearly stated the benefits and harms when interpreting the results

4(1)

3(1)

 

Only stated the benefits when interpreting the results

190(55)

190(55)