Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Erik Hess |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Erik Hess |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gordon Doig |
3 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Erik Hess |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gordon Doig |
14 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Erik Hess |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
17 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Erik Hess |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
17 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
17 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
17 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-11-57 |
You can find further information about peer review here.