Peer Review reports
From: Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sally Hopewell |
| 20 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle |
| 24 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kay Dickersin |
| 25 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hannah Rothstein |
| 26 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kerry Dwan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 26 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 26 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 16 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kerry Dwan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 10 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Kerry Dwan |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 12 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-11-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.