Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: How do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design – a reanalysis of 4 trials

Original Submission
10 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Friederike Maria-Sophie Barthel
4 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Brady
7 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Todd
7 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Walters
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Friederike Maria-Sophie Barthel
16 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Brady
17 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Todd
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Friederike Maria-Sophie Barthel
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
17 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1745-6215-10-21

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\