Peer Review reports
From: Hypertension Improvement Project (HIP): study protocol and implementation challenges
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 19 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Rowena Dolor |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 20 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Friedman |
| 23 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rowena Dolor |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 23 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rowena Dolor |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 23 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| 25 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Rowena Dolor |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 25 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Feb 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Feb 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-10-13 |
You can find further information about peer review here.