Peer Review reports
From: No short-cut in assessing trial quality: a case study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Gøtzsche |
| 14 Oct 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 10 Feb 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Karim Hirji |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Feb 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Feb 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Moher |
| 6 May 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou |
| 14 May 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Karim Hirji |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 May 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Jul 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Karim Hirji |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 19 Dec 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Karim Hirji |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Jan 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Jan 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1745-6215-10-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.