Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury with sacroiliac screw

Trials volume 25, Article number: 305 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To analyze the perioperative bleeding and hidden blood loss (HBL) of sacroiliac screw minimally invasive treatment of pelvic posterior ring injury and explore the influential factors of HBL after operation for providing reference for clinical treatment.

Method

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 369 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries treated with sacroiliac screws internal fixation at our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022. The research was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry in July 2022 (ChiCTR2200061866). The total blood loss (TBL) and HBL of patients were counted, and the factors such as gender, age, and surgical duration were statistically analyzed. The influential factors of HBL were analyzed by multiple linear regression.

Results

The TBL was 417.96 ± 98.05 ml, of which the visible blood loss (VBL) was 37.00 ± 9.0 ml and the HBL was 380.96 ± 68.8 ml. The HBL accounted for 91.14 ± 7.36% of the TBL. Gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth had significant effects on the HBL (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The HBL was the main cause of anemia after minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury with a sacroiliac screw. Gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth were closely related to the occurrence of HBL. In clinical treatment, we should consider these influential factors and take effective measures to reduce the impact of HBL on patients.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Pelvic posterior ring injuries were always caused by high-energy violence, and most of them belong to unstable injuries. The treatment had been a headache for clinical orthopedics doctors [1]. The posterior pelvic ring beard 70% of the load of the whole pelvic ring, Posterior pelvic ring injuries such as sacroiliac joint dislocation and sacral fracture were often accompanied by vertical instability and rotational instability [2]. Therefore, early effective reduction and fixation is very necessary. It can restore the stability of the pelvis and significantly reduce the occurrence of complications such as intractable pain and abnormal gait [3,4,5]. If anatomical reduction and effective fixation cannot be carried out in time, it will lead to poor curative effect and residual dysfunction [6]. Unfortunately, there was no gold standard treatment for the reduction and fixation of the posterior pelvic ring. The specific surgical method, the choice of internal fixation, and the corresponding prognosis were controversial [7]. In 1989, Matta et al. proposed a percutaneous sacroiliac screw (S1 screw) for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury, which had been recognized and accepted by more and more clinicians [8]. Biomechanical experiments showed that percutaneous sacroiliac screws had more advantages than posterior sacral rod and anterior plate fixation in shear and rotation resistance, which was in line with the central fixation principle of Biomechanics [9]. At present, percutaneous minimally invasive internal fixation by sacroiliac screw (PMISS) for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fractures has been widely used in clinic. It has the advantages of minimally invasive, short operation time, and rapid recovery [10]. In the course of disease treatment, we found that patients with posterior pelvic ring injury treated with PMISS often developed anemia. It would affect postoperative functional recovery and increase mortality [11]. Although anemia was closely related to surgical trauma and visible bleeding [12], it was also crucial to pay attention to hidden blood loss (HBL). Because the pelvis had a rich vascular network and a large amount of cancellous bone [13]. HBL was an imperceptible loss of blood. The decrease of hemoglobin (HB) or hematocrit (HCT) in patients was significantly greater than that caused by intraoperative bleeding in theory [14]. Perioperative HBL was very easy to be ignore in clinical work, which had a great impact on the prognosis of patients with pelvic injury, especially elderly patients with basic diseases. After reviewing numerous international journals, there were relatively few studies on HBL related to minimally invasive therapies, with the majority focusing on minimally invasive surgeries of the spine. Research on HBL in minimally invasive treatment of pelvic injuries remained largely unexplored [15,16,17]. This study retrospectively analyzed the case data of PMISS for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury in our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022. By analyzing the perioperative bleeding and HBL of patients to explore the influential factors of HBL after the operation and provide a reference for clinical prevention and treatment.

Patients and methods

Patients

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 369 patients with posterior pelvic ring injuries treated with PMISS at our hospital from January 2015 to January 2022. This sample size was calculated using Solvin’s formula. Inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) patients with posterior pelvic ring injury and sacroiliac screw fixation; (2) AO/OTA classification: 61b, 61c1.2, 61C1. 3 [18]; (3) blood examination was performed before and after operation; (4) no history of thrombosis, abnormal coagulation function, and other high-risk hemorrhagic diseases; (5) the clinical data were complete; (6) signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) accompanied by anterior fixation (except staged operation with external fixator); (2) old fracture and pathological fracture; (3) AO/OTA classification: 61A, 61c1. 1, 61C2, 61C3; (4) history of preoperative blood transfusion and long-term use of anticoagulants; (5) chronic hemorrhagic diseases, hematological diseases, and malignant tumors; (6) incomplete clinical data; (7) the rehydration volume was more than 2000 m1 [19] within 24 h after operation. According to the exclusion criteria, a total of 291 patients were excluded from the study. Among them, 276 patients underwent plate fixation of the anterior pelvic ring, 7 cases were rehydrated more than 2000 ml within 24 h after operation, 4 cases had incomplete clinical data, and 4 cases received a preoperative blood transfusion. The CONSORT flow chart of the included patients is shown in Fig. 1. Therefore, a total of 78 patients were included in this study with an average of (47.35 ± 5.23) years. There were 42 males and 36 females. The study protocol was approved by Ningbo NO.6 Hospital Institutional Review Board (No. L2022090). The CONSORT checklist of this study protocol are shown in Supplementary Material 1. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All patients and their families signed the informed consent.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT flow chart for patient recruitment

Full size image

Surgical method

All patients needed a clean enema the night before the operation. Under general anesthesia, the patient took the flat position and underwent C-arm fluoroscopy positioning (pelvic entrance position, exit position, and lateral position). An incision was made about 1 cm on the side of the posterior superior iliac spine, separated the soft tissue to the iliac bone, and then placed the positioning sleeve. The guide needle with a diameter of 2 mm was vertically inserted into the posterior side of the iliac wing. and the S1 vertebral body was inserted between the superior sacral notch and the S1 anterior fissure through the sacroiliac joint space, the sacral auricular surface, and the sacral wing. Through the sacroiliac joint space, sacral auricular surface, and sacral wing, the guide needle entered the S1 vertebral body. During the placement of the guide needle, we need to keep the guide needle parallel to the superior sacral notch and tilt from the rear outside to the front inside at an angle (25°) to the coronal plane of the pelvis. The C-arm fluoroscopy should be repeated to observe and adjust the position of the guide needle in the process of needle threading. According to the need of fixation, another screw can be fixed in the S1 vertebral body repeatedly or screwed at the S2 level. All hollow lag screws were 6.5 mm in diameter and were produced by China company (Weigao).

Postoperative treatment

Antibiotics were applied twice within 24 h after operation. Recheck blood routine and give blood transfusion according to anemia. Lower limb activities began on the second day after the operation. After lying in bed for 4–6 weeks, the patient started to move out of bed and gradually walk with weight on the affected limb. The X-ray would be checked regularly.

Data collection

The basic information of patients from the electronic medical record system of our hospital was collected, including the patient’s age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgical duration, time to surgery, anesthesia, anemia, blood transfusion history, smoking history, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, HB, HCT, albumin, type of posterior pelvic ring injury, fixed position, and depth (Fig. 2). The injury of the posterior pelvic ring was divided into three types. Type I was an unstable fracture of the iliac wing which can be combined with partial injury of the sacroiliac joint. Type II was an unstable injury of the sacroiliac joint and type III was an unstable fracture of the sacrum. All indicators were measured by the same researcher 3 times, and then the average value was taken to reduce the error. Hemoglobin was used to assess the patient’s anemia. According to the definition of the World Health Organization, men < 130 g/L and women < 120 g/L were defined as anemia [20].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Definition of screw depth: make a connecting line at the front edge of the sacroiliac joint on both sides at the pelvic entrance position and divide it into four equal parts. The sacroiliac screw head can reach area AB, area BC, area CD and area DE, which are I-degree, II-degree, III-degree, and IV-degree, respectively

Full size image

Blood volume calculation

The blood volume (BV) of the patient was calculated according to the equation proposed by Nadler et al. [21]:

$${\text{BV}}={\text{k}}1\times {\text{H}}3+{\text{k}}2\times {\text{W}}+{\text{k}}3$$

(BV: the preoperative blood volume (L); H: height (m); W: body mass (kg); male: k1 = 0.3669, k2 = 0.03219, K3 = 0.6041; female: k1 = 0.3561, k2 = 0.03308, k3 = 0.1833).

Visible blood loss (VBL)

VBL = blood volume in the suction bottle + increased blood volume such as gauze − flushing fluid volume.

Total blood loss (TBL)

The loss of red blood cells in postoperative blood can be calculated by the difference between preoperative and postoperative HCT.

Red blood cell loss = BV × (HCT before and HCT after) + blood transfusion.

TBL = red blood cell loss (L)/HCT mean [22].

(HCT mean = 1/2 × (HCT before + HCT after), the results of the HCT examination on the morning of the second day after admission were HCT before, and the results of the HCT examination on the morning of the third day were HCTafter).

Hidden blood loss (HBL)

HBL = TBL − VBL.

Hidden blood loss ratio

HBL ratio = HBL/TBL.

Statistical analysis

All data were described and analyzed by SPSS 22.0 (IBM, USA). The normality test of measurement data was carried out by Kolmogorov Smirnov. The description of measurement data adopted xˉ ± s or median (interquartile range) according to the data distribution type. The Pearson correlation test was used to analyze measurement data. Rate or percentage was used to describe counting data. At the same time, the Spearman correlation was used for statistical analysis. The variables with high correlation were selected, and the independent risk factors related to hidden blood loss were determined by hierarchical regression analysis. A positive coefficient indicated a positive effect on the dependent variable (hidden blood loss), while a negative coefficient indicated a negative effect on the dependent variable. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Perioperative bleeding volume

In this study, the TBL of patients was 417.96 ± 98.05 ml, of which the VBL was 37.00 ± 9.0 ml and the HBL was 380.96 ± 68.8 ml. The HBL accounted for 91.14 ± 7.36% of the TBL (Table 1).

Table 1 Perioperative blood loss of patients
Full size table

Influential factors of perioperative HBL

Age, gender, BMI, surgical duration, time to surgery, anesthesia, anemia, blood transfusion history, smoking history, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases, perioperative gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic anticoagulation, HB, HCT, albumin, type of posterior pelvic ring injury, fixed position, and depth were included in the analysis of possible influential factors of HBL in our study (Table 2). All patients were operated on under general anesthesia, and all patients had anemia after the operation, so the factors of anesthesia and postoperative anemia were excluded. Pearson correlation test analyzed age, BMI, surgical duration, time to surgery, HB, HCT, and albumin. BMI and surgical duration were significantly correlated with HBL (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Spearman correlation test statistically analyzed gender, anemia (preoperative), blood transfusion history, smoking history, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases, perioperative gastrointestinal bleeding, chronic anticoagulation, type of posterior pelvic ring injury, fixed position and depth. We found the gender, fixed position, and fixed depth had significant effects on the HBL (P < 0.05) (Table 4). Finally, BMI, surgical duration, gender, fixed position, and fixed depth were included in multiple linear regression analysis. It was found that surgical duration, gender, fixed position, and fixed depth had significant effects on HBL (P < 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 2 Patient’s demographic information
Full size table
Table 3 Results of Pearson correlation analysis for hidden blood loss
Full size table
Table 4 Results of Spearman correlation analysis for hidden blood loss
Full size table
Table 5 Results of hierarchical regression analysis for hidden blood loss
Full size table

Discussion

The posterior pelvic ring was also known as the sacroiliac complex. It was a stable structure formed by the sacrum and bilateral iliac bones through the interosseous sacroiliac ligament, anterior and posterior sacroiliac ligament, sacral tubercle ligament, sacral spine ligament, and iliolumbar ligament, which played a vital role in maintaining the stability of the whole pelvis [23]. Arterial anastomosis widely existed in the pelvis, and the inner wall of the pelvis was covered with venous plexus. The arteries and veins were connected with each other and there was no venous valve. Once damaged, it was easy to cause extensive bleeding. Our study also found that 71.79% of patients with posterior pelvic ring injury had preoperative anemia, while the incidence of postoperative anemia after PMISS was 100%. This was a cognitive gap with our usual view that PMISS of posterior pelvic ring injury had less bleeding and rapid recovery. We tended to focus on VBL, which was easy to ignore for hidden bleeding. The HBL was first observed by Pattison et al. after knee arthroplasty. Subsequently, Sehat et al. calculated the real quantitative HBL through a gross equation. They found that HBL accounted for about 50% of the TBL, which was considered to be caused by blood infiltration into tissue space and cell hemolysis [24]. There were many tissue gaps around the pelvis, and the surrounding vascular network was rich. Bleeding was easy to accumulate in the surrounding tissue gaps and causes nonspecific hemolysis to destroy the structure of red blood cells. The destruction of tissue structure led to the loss of function and the reduction of erythrocytes and hemoglobin involved in metabolism. Smorgick et al. found that the percentage of HBL in posterior lumbar surgery was about 39 ~ 42% [25] of the total blood loss, while the percentage of HBL in Xu’s study was higher (47%) [26]. In hip surgery, the percentage of HBL fluctuated from 50 to 80% [27,28,29]. Compared with the research status of HBL in spine surgery and hip surgery, there were few reports on the injury of the posterior pelvic ring. Our study found that the HBL was 380.96 ± 68.8 ml which accounted for 91.14 ± 7.36% of the TBL (417.96 ± 98.05 ml) in the PMISS of posterior pelvic ring injury. Therefore, HBL may be the main cause of postoperative anemia in patients. PMISS in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury has been highly praised in orthopedics because of its advantages of minimally invasive and rapid postoperative recovery [30]. During the whole operation, there was very little bleeding visible to the naked eye which often led to doctors ignoring the attention of patients with postoperative anemia. The results of this study revealed a significantly high probability of postoperative anemia in such patients. It was a significant disparity between this and traditional perceptions of bleeding in minimally invasive pelvic surgeries, with surgeons often assuming minimal blood loss in such procedures. This was also the most meaningful and important finding of this study. Therefore, surgeons needed to enhance their awareness of HBL in minimally invasive pelvic surgeries and take corresponding measures in clinical practice. Surgeons should assess preoperative blood loss, monitor blood routine regularly, and promptly replenish blood volume. Transfusion therapy may be necessary to maintain stable circulating blood volume, reduce complications, and improve the safety and prognosis of surgery. For patients, this can accelerate their recovery. For society, it can save on healthcare expenditures.

This research found that the main influential factors of HBL in PMISS were gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth. The HBL was greater in male patients than in female patients, and similar findings were found in many previous studies [31,32,33]. Male patients seem to be more closely related to perioperative HBL. The probability of requiring a blood transfusion after the operation was also higher than that of women [33]. The reason was not clear. We believed that this was related to the advantages of male patients in body mass index and blood volume. In addition, women tended to reduce hormone secretion and increase osteoclast activity after menopause. This made osteoporosis significantly more severe than in male patients. Osteoporosis could reduce the blood supply to the bone marrow cavity. Therefore, the blood loss during the operation would be reduced too. Surgical duration was also an influential factor of perioperative HBL. The same findings were found in the study of Lei et al. [34, 35]. The extension of operation time meant an increase in the operation step. In the process of sacroiliac screw placement, it was necessary to repeatedly find the most appropriate screw placement direction and depth. Each insertion and extraction of the guide needle would create a nail hole tunnel in the sacroiliac bone, which were potential bleeding points. Moreover, long operation time could also increase the body’s traumatic stress response and cause the release of a large number of inflammatory factors, so as to inhibit the formation of red blood cells and increase the incidence of HBL. The fixed position as the influential factor referred to the simultaneous placement of screws in sacrals 1 and 2, which would prolong the operation time, increase the number of screws and bone channels and naturally increase the corresponding blood loss. The fixed depth was divided into 4 degrees. The different depths could significantly affect the perioperative hidden blood loss. The implantation of the sacroiliac screw first needed the guidance of a guide needle, and then the hollow screw was inserted. The whole process was like the reaming of long bones. The screw head at the front end rotated to expand the bone marrow cavity and moved forward. The deeper the screw, the longer the bone tunnel. At the same time, the hollow design was easy to cause the blood seepage in the bone marrow to flow out into the tissue space through the tunnel after the removal of the guide needle. The longer the tunnel, the more bone marrow is destroyed around it, and the greater the amount of bleeding.

This study was a small sample retrospective study that lacked multi-center and large sample data to provide clinical guidance with more reference value. Pelvic posterior ring injury often involved anterior ring injury and surgery, so it was difficult to collect cases that simply dealt with posterior ring injury. The cases of emergency surgery with anterior ring external fixation were also included ((1) the external fixation had little trauma and the amount of bleeding was almost negligible; (2) external fixation had little interference with our analysis of the HBL in secondary sacroiliac screw fixation of posterior ring injury). Moreover, the research on the pathogenesis was obviously insufficient and needed to be further discussed.

Conclusions

The blood loss of PMISS in the treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury has received little attention.

This study found that the HBL accounted for more than 90% of the TBL, which was the main cause of anemia in postoperative patients. Gender, surgical duration, fixed position, and fixed depth were closely related to the occurrence of HBL. In clinical treatment, we should consider these influential factors and take positive and effective measures to prevent HBL.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HBL:

Hidden blood loss

TBL:

Total blood loss

VBL:

Visible blood loss

PMISS:

Percutaneous minimally invasive internal fixation by sacroiliac screw

HB:

Hemoglobin

HCT:

Hematocrit

BMI:

Body mass index

BV:

Blood volume

References

  1. Obey MR, et al. Effect of percutaneous posterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation on patient-reported outcomes. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(Suppl 2):S17-22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marenghi N, et al. Contributions of pubic rami fracture morphology and fixation to pelvic ring stability in type 1 lateral compression injuries: a biomechanical cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(Suppl 2):S7-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rojas C, et al. Fixation failure in patients with traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: impact of loss of reduction on early functional outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):661.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Busso C, et al. Algo-functional indexes and spatiotemporal parameters of gait after sacroiliac joint arthrodesis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(9):2860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Poole WEC, et al. Is unrestricted weight bearing immediately after fixation of rotationally unstable pelvic fractures safe? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu SD, et al. The risk of erectile dysfunction following pelvic angiographic embolization in pelvic fracture patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. World J Surg. 2019;43(2):476–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman JR, et al. Association between Young-Burgess pelvic ring injury classification and concomitant injuries requiring urgent intervention. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(6):1099–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kułakowski M, et al. Differences in accuracy and radiation dose in placement of iliosacral screws: comparison between 3D and 2D fluoroscopy. J Clin Med. 2022;11(6):1466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthé R, et al. Posterior hinge fixation for the treatment of unstable traumatic sacroiliac joint injuries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108(2):103203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han W, et al. Percutaneous robot-assisted versus freehand S2 iliosacral screw fixation in unstable posterior pelvic ring fracture. Orthop Surg. 2022;14(2):221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu S, et al. Minimally invasive internal fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures: a retrospective study of 27 cases. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker CA, et al. Minimally invasive screw fixation is as stable as anterior plating in acetabular T-Type fractures - a biomechanical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(7):1055–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin SS, et al. The effect of preperitoneal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Chin J Traumatol. 2021;24(2):100–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolz JM, et al. Hidden blood loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108:103216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin-Gorgojo V, et al. Hidden blood loss in minimally invasive surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2023;13:S1888-4415(23)00262-X.

  16. Ge M, et al. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop. 2022;46(9):2063–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou Y, et al. Hidden blood loss and its possible risk factors in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):445.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ansorge A, et al. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(6):102999.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okuzu Y, et al. Closed suction drainage is not beneficial in hybrid total hip arthroplasty with intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Int Orthop. 2022;46(6):1281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beghe C, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in geri- atrics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004;116(7A):3s–10s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadler SB, et al. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery. 1962;51(2):224–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gross JB. Estimating allowable blood loss: corrected for dilution. Anesthesiology. 1983;58(3):277–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grüneweller N, et al. Instability of the posterior pelvic ring: introduction of innovative implants. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Thukral R, et al. Management of distal femoral periprosthetic fractures by distal femoral locking plate, a retrospective study. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(2):199–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Smorgick Y, et al. Hidden blood loss during posterior spine fusion surgery. Spine J. 2013;13:877–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu D, et al. The further exploration of hidden blood loss in posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(4):527–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tian S, et al. Dynamic analysis of perioperative hidden blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029618823279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu K, et al. Hidden blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty using the superPATH approach: a retrospective study. Injury. 2019;50(12):2282–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang JQ, et al. Oxidized regenerated cellulose can reduce hidden blood loss after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study. J Invest Surg. 2019;32(8):716–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tidwell J, et al. Percutaneous sacroiliac screw technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 2):S19-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang JQ, et al. Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after intramedullary nail fixation of extra-articular tibial fractures - a retrospective cohort study. Injury. 2020;51(6):1382–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith GH, et al. The hidden blood loss after hip fracture. Injury. 2011;42(2):133–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Prasad N, et al. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors. Int Orthop. 2007;31(1):39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lei F, et al. Hidden blood loss and the risk factors after posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(19):e20103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wen L, et al. Hidden blood loss in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: an analysis of risk factors. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31(4):180–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article was supported by the Ningbo Medical Science and Technology Project (2021Y56).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ding Xu and Min Liu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Ningbo NO.6 Hospital, 1059 East Zhongshan Road, Ningbo, China

    Ding Xu, Weigang Lou, Ming Li, Yunqiang Zhuang & Jianming Chen

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

    Min Liu

  3. Ningbo University Medical College, Ningbo, 315211, China

    Ding Xu, Jingwei Xiao & Hongbao Wu

Authors
  1. Ding Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weigang Lou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingwei Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hongbao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yunqiang Zhuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DX and ML (Min Liu) provided major contributions to writing and editing the manuscript. WGL and ML (Ming Li) participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. JMC and YQZ supervised the writing of the manuscript. WGL, JWX, and BHW interpreted the radiologic results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ding Xu, Yunqiang Zhuang or Jianming Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

All patients gave written informed consent to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish individual data was obtained from all patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, D., Liu, M., Lou, W. et al. Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after minimally invasive treatment of posterior pelvic ring injury with sacroiliac screw. Trials 25, 305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08147-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08147-0

Keywords

Trials

ISSN: 1745-6215