Volume 12 Supplement 1

Clinical Trials Methodology Conference 2011

Open Access

An adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short-term endpoint information

Trials201112(Suppl 1):A2

DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A2

Published: 13 December 2011

Adaptive seamless phase II/III designs enable a clinical trial to be conducted in stages with the most promising of a number of experimental treatments selected on the basis of data observed in the first stage to continue along with the control treatment to the second and any subsequent stages. The main statistical challenge in such a design is ensuring control of the type I error rate. Most methodology for such trials is based on the same endpoint being used for interim and final analyses. In some settings the primary endpoint can be observed only after long-term follow-up. In this case it may be desirable to use short-term endpoint data along with any long-term data available at the interim analysis to inform treatment selection. If short-term data are available for some patients for whom the primary endpoint is not available, basing treatment selection on these data may lead to inflation of the type I error rate.

This talk presents a new method [1] that allows the use of short-term endpoint information for treatment selection whilst controlling the overall type I error rate. The method builds on the work of Galbraith and Marschner [2], who proposed a method for using short-term endpoints in interim analyses for comparison of a single experimental treatment with a control. The method is based on adjustment of the usual group-sequential boundaries [3, 4] to allow for monitoring of a test statistic obtained from fitting a bivariate normal model to the correlated short-term and long-term endpoints. The model can be fitted either using a linear mixed model or by combining the results from separate linear regression models for the short and long-term data [5].

Result will be presented from a simulation study to investigate the properties of the new method. In addition to verifying control of the type I error rate, these results show that the use of the short-term endpoint data can lead to an increase in power when the short and long-term endpoints are correlated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Statistics and Epidemiology, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick

References

  1. Stallard N: A confirmatory seamless phase II/III clinical trial design incorporating short-term endpoint information. Statistics in Medicine. 2010, 29: 959-971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Galbraith S, Marschner IC: Interim analysis of continuous long-term endpoints in clinical trials with longitudinal outcomes. Statistics in Medicine. 2003, 22: 1787-1805. 10.1002/sim.1311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jennison C, Turnbull BW: Group-sequential analysis incorporating covariate information. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1997, 92: 1330-1341. 10.2307/2965403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Stallard N, Todd S: Sequential designs for phase III clinical trials incorporating treatment selection. Statistics in Medicine. 2003, 22: 689-703. 10.1002/sim.1362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Engel B, Walstra P: Increasing precision or reducing expense in regression experiments by using information from a concomitant variable. Biometrics. 1991, 47: 13-20. 10.2307/2532491.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Stallard; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement