Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effect of rosuvastatin on outcomes in chronic haemodialysis patients – design and rationale of the AURORA study

  • Bengt Fellström1Email author,
  • Faiez Zannad2,
  • Roland Schmieder3,
  • Hallvard Holdaas4,
  • Alan Jardine5,
  • Helen Rose6,
  • Wim Wilpshaar7 and
  • the AURORA Study Group
Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine20056:9

DOI: 10.1186/1468-6708-6-9

Received: 04 April 2005

Accepted: 23 May 2005

Published: 23 May 2005

Abstract

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are at high risk of cardiovascular events. Multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis are present in ESRD and may contribute to the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in this population. In contrast to patients with normal renal function, the benefits of modifying lipid levels on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ESRD on haemodialysis have yet to be confirmed in large prospective randomised trials. A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events (AURORA) will be the first large-scale international trial to assess the effects of statin therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients on chronic haemodialysis.

Methods

More than 2,750 ESRD patients who have been receiving chronic haemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months have been randomised (1:1), irrespective of baseline lipid levels, to treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg or placebo. The primary study endpoint is the time to a major cardiovascular event (first occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke). Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular event-free survival time, time to cardiovascular death, time to non-cardiovascular death, cardiovascular interventions, tolerability of treatment and health economic costs per life-year saved. Study medication will be given until 620 subjects have experienced a major cardiovascular event.

Conclusion

Our hypothesis is that results from AURORA will establish the clinical efficacy and tolerability of rosuvastatin in patients with ESRD receiving chronic haemodialysis and guide the optimal management of this expanding population.

Keywords

atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease end-stage renal disease haemodialysis lipids statin

Background

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis have substantially higher cardiovascular disease mortality rates than the general population [15]. Accelerated atherosclerosis has been observed in haemodialysis patients [6] and may contribute to this increased cardiovascular event rate. Treatment of ESRD and its cardiovascular consequences places a large burden upon healthcare providers, and the cost and prevalence are expected to increase greatly over the next decade [5]. Therefore, controlling risk factors for atherosclerosis may play an important role in preventing cardiovascular events in these individuals.

Hydroxy-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have been demonstrated to reduce coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in several landmark trials [714]. The reductions in cardiovascular events also occur in patients with average to lower than average baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels [12, 14] and the benefits of statin therapy can be independent of lipid lowering [15]. Most haemodialysis patients do not have elevated cholesterol (total and LDL-C) [16, 17], and the highest mortality risk is often in patients with very low cholesterol levels [18]. Other chronic diseases and malnutrition may act to lower blood cholesterol and independently increase the risk of death, thereby contributing to the negative association between very low cholesterol and mortality observed in these patients [19, 20]. Indeed, a recent prospective study suggests that levels of total cholesterol (TC) may be associated with mortality in haemodialysis patients without evidence of inflammation and malnutrition [20]. Haemodialysis patients have other lipid abnormalities such as lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and triglycerides [16, 17].

Although the efficacy of statins is well established in conditions associated with increased cardiovascular risk, dialysis patients have generally been excluded from statin outcome trials because of their related co-morbidities and as a result of pharmacokinetic and safety issues. It is not appropriate to extrapolate evidence from patients with normal renal function to patients with ESRD on haemodialysis, and there is a need to investigate the benefit-risk profile of statins specifically in this population. Data from an observational study indicate that statin treatment may improve survival in patients with ESRD [21]. Mortality was 32% lower in patients with ESRD who received statin treatment compared with patients not receiving statins, a finding that is consistent with other large outcome statin trials [7, 8, 11]. However, observational studies do not establish a causal relationship and large-scale randomised studies are required [22]. The Die Deutsche Diabetes Dialyse Studie (4D study) investigated the effect of atorvastatin 20 mg or placebo on cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke in 1,255 patients with type 2 diabetes who were on haemodialysis treatment for no more than 2 years [23]. Initial results presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology indicate that the primary endpoint was reduced by 8% after 4 years' treatment with atorvastatin, but this was not significantly different from placebo [24]. Further large-scale long-term prospective, randomised studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of statins for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, specifically in ESRD patients on haemodialysis [22].

Rosuvastatin is the most efficacious of the available statins for lowering LDL-C levels, causing reductions of 47% at the initial starting dose of 10 mg [25]. In addition, rosuvastatin has benefits across the lipid profile, including increases in HDL-C, reductions in small dense LDL and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles [25, 26], and has a safety profile consistent with other available statins [27]. These properties make it an ideal agent for a study investigating the benefits of statin treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events in a population of patients at high risk of cardiovascular events. AURORA (A study to evaluate the Use of Rosuvastatin in subjects On Regular haemodialysis: an Assessment of survival and cardiovascular events) is the first large-scale international trial to assess the effects of a statin on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients on chronic haemodialysis irrespective of baseline lipid levels.

Methods

Study design

AURORA is a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase IIIb, parallel-group study comparing the effects of rosuvastatin (10 mg once daily) with placebo on survival and cardiovascular events in ESRD patients on chronic haemodialysis.

More than 2,750 subjects from approximately 300 centres in Europe, Canada, Australia, Brazil, Mexico and South Korea have been randomised, irrespective of baseline lipid levels. During the recruitment period, patients were screened over 2 weeks for eligibility according to the major inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1). Demographic data were collected on age, gender, race, medical history, physical examination (including height, weight, blood pressure and heart rate), smoking status, and method and duration of dialysis (Table 2). Patients were then randomised (1:1) into the two blinded treatment arms of the study, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day or placebo, and visits to assess safety and efficacy are scheduled to occur at 3 months, 6 months and every 6 months thereafter until the end of the study (Figure 1; Table 2).
Table 1

Major eligibility criteria

Inclusion

Men and women aged 50–80 years

End-stage renal failure and chronic haemodialysis for at least 3 months

Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion

Underlying haematological, neoplastic, GI, metabolic (other than diabetes) or infectious condition expected to reduce survival to less than 1 year

Patients likely to require a kidney transplant within 1 year

Statin therapy within the previous 6 months

History of serious reactions to statins

Unexplained CK >3 times ULN

Active liver disease (ALT >3 times ULN)

Uncontrolled hypothyroidism

A disallowed medication, such as another lipid-modifying agent or cyclosporin

ALT: Alanine transaminase, CK: Creatine kinase, GI: Gastrointestinal, ULN: Upper limit of normal

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1468-6708-6-9/MediaObjects/13063_2005_Article_128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Study design

Objectives and endpoints

The primary objective of the AURORA study is to compare the effects of rosuvastatin with placebo on cardiovascular events. The primary endpoint is the time to a major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke). An independent and blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee (see Appendix) will review all deaths, strokes and myocardial infarctions using a predefined set of event definitions to ensure consistency of event diagnosis across all subjects throughout the study.

Secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular event-free survival, cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, procedures as a result of stenosis or thrombosis of the vascular access for chronic haemodialysis (arteriovenous fistulas and grafts only), and coronary or peripheral revascularisations. Furthermore, the tolerability of rosuvastatin in ESRD patients undergoing regular chronic haemodialysis will be compared with placebo. The health economic impact of rosuvastatin treatment on the utilisation of resources and costs associated with the occurrence of a major cardiovascular event will also be assessed. Costs related to hospitalisations will be combined with survival analyses to enable the calculation of cost per life-year saved.

Tertiary objectives include assessing the efficacy of treatment at 3 and 12 months post-randomisation on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and various fasting lipid parameters: TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, triglycerides, apolipoprotein B (Apo B), apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI), Apo B/Apo AI ratio, and oxidised LDL. Additionally, changes in TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C and triglycerides will be assessed after 24 months, 36 months (then yearly as required) and at the final visit. A central laboratory service (Quintiles Laboratories, Livingston, UK) certified for standardisation of lipid analyses by the Standardization Program of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute will perform all laboratory testing of lipids and hsCRP. Additional laboratory work will be performed in subgroup studies analysing the predictive power of various other markers of cardiovascular risk.

Genetic research may also be performed on certain subjects at some study sites on an optional basis. DNA samples will be obtained for future research into the effects of genetic polymorphisms on the response to rosuvastatin and placebo. Susceptibility to, and prognosis of, cardiovascular disease and lipid disorders will also be studied.

Study population

Eligibility and treatment withdrawal

Irrespective of baseline lipid levels, patients aged 50–80 years with ESRD who have been receiving chronic haemodialysis for at least 3 months were considered for inclusion in the study unless they fulfilled any of the exclusion criteria (key criteria detailed in Table 1). In addition, patients who undergo kidney transplant surgery will be withdrawn from study medication, but will continue to follow scheduled study assessments. Treatment will also be discontinued if patients have creatine kinase >10 times upper limit of normal (ULN) accompanied by unexplained muscle pain or if myopathy is suspected or if the patient becomes pregnant. Other reasons that may lead to treatment discontinuation include: an adverse event or endpoint that in the opinion of the investigator warrants treatment withdrawal; alanine transaminase increase >3 times ULN on two occasions; other safety reasons as judged by the investigator; protocol non-compliance.

Ethics

The study protocol and patient consent form have been approved by an Independent Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, as appropriate. The study is being performed in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation/Good Clinical Practice. The investigator from each centre will ensure that subjects are given full and adequate oral and written information about the nature, purpose, risks and benefits of the study and that written consent is obtained. The conduct and progress of the study is reviewed by the Steering Committee and Executive Steering Committee (see Appendix). In addition, an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) (see Appendix) is responsible for monitoring all safety aspects of the study. The DSMB will review and evaluate all serious adverse events and endpoints at least every 6 months using unblinded data and will then report to the Executive Steering Committee in a blinded manner. The DSMB will also be responsible for making recommendations to the Executive Steering Committee regarding modifying or stopping the study early.

Data analysis

The efficacy endpoints will be analysed using the intent-to-treat population, including all randomised subjects. For the time-to-event endpoints, Kaplan-Meier curves will be used to show the proportion of subjects without an endpoint. An unadjusted Cox Proportional Hazards model with treatment as the covariate will be used to analyse the endpoint. An additional Cox Proportional Hazards regression model [28] will also be constructed adjusting for known and potential risk factors as a secondary analysis and to test for interactions between risk factors and treatment. The number of coronary or peripheral revascularisations will also be summarised, but not formally analysed. For the tertiary endpoints, the percentage change from baseline for each parameter will be assessed for each time point by an analysis of covariance, with the baseline value as a covariate. An exploratory analysis will also be conducted to examine whether lipid values at 3, 12, 24, 36 months (yearly if required) and at the final visit are predictive of future cardiovascular events.

The sample size was determined such that the study will be adequately powered for the analysis of the primary endpoint, time from randomisation to a major cardiovascular event. Based on previous studies, it is anticipated that the cardiovascular event rate in the placebo group will be 11% per year. The sample size has been calculated in order to be able to detect a 25% reduction in cardiovascular events rate per year at a two-sided significance level of 4.86%, with 90% power. The study will continue until 620 subjects have experienced a major cardiovascular event. This is expected to be approximately 3.9 years after initiation of the study, which began in January 2003. An interim efficacy analysis will be conducted by the DSMB when 310 subjects have experienced a major cardiovascular event. The purpose of the interim analysis is to investigate, at this time, the possibility of concluding a statistically significant difference between the treatments for time from randomisation to major cardiovascular event.

Discussion

Patients with ESRD have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [2, 4], and this contributes to the large burden this disease places upon healthcare providers [5]. A number of studies have indicated that patients on dialysis with very low TC levels have a higher rate of mortality [18, 20]. Both small dense LDL and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins have been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease [2932] and are common in patients with ESRD and on haemodialysis [16, 3337]. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, in particular IDL, are prevalent and predictive of atherosclerosis in haemodialysis patients [17]. Thus, modifying lipid levels with a statin should have beneficial effects on cardiovascular outcomes in these patients. Large outcome studies also indicate that the positive effects of statins occur irrespective of baseline lipid levels [12, 14]. While the efficacy of statins for altering the lipid profile has been studied previously in ESRD patients [3842], their long-term benefits on cardiovascular outcomes in this population have not yet been examined and dialysis patients have generally been excluded from statin outcome trials.

Several studies examining outcome after statin treatment have recently been completed or are in progress in patients with related conditions. In a study in renal transplant patients, fluvastatin reduced the risk of cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction by 35% compared with subjects receiving placebo (risk ratio 0.65 [95% confidence intervals 0.48–0.88]; p = 0.005) [43]. Initial findings of the 4D study did not demonstrate a significant difference between atorvastatin 20 mg and placebo treatment; however, LDL-C levels were reduced during the study period [24]. Another study is ongoing; the Study of Heart And Renal Protection (SHARP) aims to assess the effects of simvastatin and the cholesterol-absorption inhibitor ezetimibe among patients with chronic kidney disease [18]. AURORA is the first international, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess whether statin therapy alone can reduce the incidence of coronary events in ESRD patients on chronic haemodialysis.

Most haemodialysis patients do not have elevated LDL-C and, in accordance with findings from the Heart Protection Study, the AURORA trial will randomise patients irrespective of their baseline lipid levels [12]. Patients on haemodialysis have lower levels of HDL-C and higher triglycerides compared with control subjects [16]. Accordingly, a statin with efficacy across the lipid profile would be appropriate to assess the benefits of treatment in ESRD patients. Rosuvastatin is the most efficacious statin reported for lowering LDL-C [44], and has benefits across the lipid profile. In a study of hypercholesterolaemic patients, rosuvastatin has been shown to increase HDL-C by 7.7–9.6% compared with 4.4–5.7% for atorvastatin and 5.2–6.0% for simvastatin across the 10–40 mg dose range [44]. In addition, rosuvastatin has been shown to substantially lower triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in both hypercholesterolaemic and hypertriglyceridaemic patients [45]. The effects of haemodialysis upon excretion of statins should also be considered. On the basis of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety data obtained from a pilot study, rosuvastatin 10 mg can be safely administered to patients with ESRD on chronic haemodialysis (data on file, AstraZeneca).

In addition to their ability to modify lipid levels, statins produce other effects that may benefit ESRD patients. Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, and it is enhanced in patients with renal insufficiency [46, 47]. Recently, statins have been reported to have anti-oxidant effects [48], which may be of benefit to these patients. Statins may also have additional non-lipid or pleiotropic effects, for example, improving endothelial function [15]. Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease and has been shown to be closely associated with the degree of renal insufficiency [49]. Pre-clinical experiments have shown that rosuvastatin can improve endothelial function [50], although this has yet to be verified in a clinical situation. Finally, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure can also develop in ESRD patients on haemodialysis [51]. Statin therapy has been reported to reduce left ventricular hypertrophy [52] and retrospective analyses indicate that these agents can also help to prevent heart failure [53]. These properties could provide an additional beneficial effect in ESRD patients.

The AURORA study should provide valuable information on the utility of statin treatment for the reduction of cardiovascular events in patients with ESRD. As an atherogenic lipid profile and endothelial dysfunction are often present in individuals with ESRD and contribute to the development of atherosclerosis, it is anticipated that rosuvastatin will improve cardiovascular outcomes in this patient population. Furthermore, it is hoped that AURORA will produce data on the cost effectiveness (cost due to hospitalisation and cost per year of life saved) and long-term safety of rosuvastatin treatment in ESRD patients receiving chronic haemodialysis. This study will also generate a large database of information from a well-documented cohort, which may be valuable in the epidemiological evaluation of cardiovascular risk in patients with ESRD.

Appendix

Executive Steering Committee

Professor B Fellström (Principal Investigator; Uppsala, Sweden), Professor F Zannad (Toul, France), Professor R Schmieder (Erlangen, Germany), Dr H Holdaas (Olso, Norway), Dr A Jardine (Glasgow, UK).

Steering Committee

Executive Steering Committee members plus Dr K Bannister (Adelaide, Australia), Dr J Beutler (Utrecht, The Netherlands), Professor D Chae (Kyungki-Do, South Korea), Professor SM Cobbe (Glasgow, UK), Dr B Espinoza Vazquez (Colonia Toriello Guerra, Mexico), Professor C Gronhagen-Riska (Helsinki, Finland), Dr J Lima (Sao Paulo, Brazil), Professor R Lins (Antwerpen, Belgium), Dr A McMahon (Edmonton, Canada), Professor G Mayer (Innsbruck, Austria), Professor H Parving (Gentofte, Denmark), Professor G Remuzzi (Bergamo, Italy), Dr O Samuelsson (Goteborg, Sweden), Professor S Sonkodi (Szeged, Hungary), Dr G Suleymanlar (Antalya, Turkey), Professor V Tesar (Prague, Czech Republic), Dr D Tsakiris (Veria, Greece), Professor V Todorov (Pleven, Bulgaria), Professor A Wiecek (Katowice, Poland), Professor R Wûthrich (Gallen, Switzerland).

Data and Safety Monitoring Board

Professor H Dargie (Chair; Glasgow, UK), Professor E Ritz (Heidelberg, Germany), Professor H Wedel (Goteborg, Sweden), Professor AH Zwinderman (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Clinical Endpoint Committee

Professor SM Cobbe (Chair; Glasgow, UK), Dr A Brady (Glasgow, UK), Dr C Deighan (Glasgow, UK), Dr A Gaw (Glasgow, UK), Professor P Macfarlane (Glasgow, UK), Professor D Stott (Glasgow, UK).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the individuals and committees listed in the Appendix (below) for their invaluable contributions to the planning and implementation of this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medical Science, Renal Unit, University Hospital
(2)
Clinical Investigation Center INSERM (CIC), Hôpital Jeanne d'Arc
(3)
Med Klinik IV, Univ.-Klinik Erlangen-Nürnberg
(4)
Department of Nephrology, Rikshospitalet
(5)
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary Hospital
(6)
AstraZeneca
(7)
AstraZeneca

References

  1. Brown JH, Hunt LP, Vites NP, Short CD, Gokal R, Mallick NP: Comparative mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994, 9: 1136-1142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ: Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998, 32: S112-S119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Levey AS, Beto JA, Coronado BE, Eknoyan G, Foley RN, Kasiske BL, Klag MJ, Mailloux LU, Manske CL, Meyer KB, Parfrey PS, Pfeffer MA, Wenger NK, Wilson PW, Wright JT: Controlling the epidemic of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. National Kidney Foundation Task Force on Cardiovascular Disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998, 32: 853-906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Parfrey PS: Cardiac disease in dialysis patients: diagnosis, burden of disease, prognosis, risk factors and management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000, 15 (Suppl 5): 58-68. 10.1093/ndt/15.suppl_5.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. US Renal Data System: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 2000. Annual Data Report. 2000, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  6. Lindner A, Charra B, Sherrard DJ, Scribner BH: Accelerated atherosclerosis in prolonged maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 1974, 290: 697-701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group: Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet. 1994, 344: 1383-1389.Google Scholar
  8. Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Isles CG, Lorimer AR, MacFarlane PW, McKillop JH, Packard CJ, for the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group: Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 1995, 333: 1301-1307. 10.1056/NEJM199511163332001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, Brown L, Warnica JW, Arnold JMO, Wun C-C, Davis BR, Braunwald E: The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. N Eng J Med. 1996, 335: 1001-1009. 10.1056/NEJM199610033351401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Downs JR, Clearfield M, Weis S, Whitney E, Shapiro DR, Beere PA, Langendorfer A, Stein EA, Kruyer W, Gotto AM: Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels. Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS. JAMA. 1998, 279: 1615-1622. 10.1001/jama.279.20.1615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. The Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group: Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels. N Eng J Med. 1998, 339: 1349-1357. 10.1056/NEJM199811053391902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002, 360: 7-22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09327-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Bollen EL, Buckley BM, Cobbe SM, Ford I, Gaw A, Hyland M, Jukema JW, Kamper AM, MacFlarlane PW, Meinders AE, Norrie J, Packard CJ, Perry IJ, Stott DJ, Sweeney BJ, Twomey C, Westendorp RG: Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1623-1630. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11600-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Sever PS, Dahlöf B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, Obrien E, Östergren J, for the ASCOT investigators: Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003, 361: 1149-1158. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12948-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Laufs U: Beyond lipid-lowering: effects of statins on endothelial nitric oxide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 58: 719-731.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shoji T, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Tanka M, Kawasaki K, Tabata T, Inoue T, Morii H: Atherogenic lipoprotein changes in the absence of hyperlipidemia in patients with chronic renal failure treated by hemodialysis. Atherosclerosis. 1997, 131: 229-236. 10.1016/S0021-9150(97)00054-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shoji T, Nishizawa Y, Kawagishi T, Kawasaki K, Taniwaki H, Tabata T, Inoue T, Morii H: Intermediate-density lipoprotein as an independent risk factor for aortic atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998, 9: 1277-1284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Baigent C, Landry M: Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Kidney Int. 2003, 63 (Suppl 84): 207-210. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.63.s84.4.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Baigent C, Burbury K, Wheeler D: Premature cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure. Lancet. 2000, 356: 147-152. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02456-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Coresh J, Eustace JA, Longenecker JC, Jaar B, Fink NE, Tracy RP, Powe NR, Klag MJ: Association between cholesterol level and mortality in dialysis patients: role of inflammation and malnutrition. JAMA. 2004, 291: 451-459. 10.1001/jama.291.4.451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Seliger SL, Weiss NS, Gillen DL, Kestenbaum B, Ball A, Sherrard DJ, Stehman-Breen CO: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are associated with reduced mortality in ESRD patients. Kidney Int. 2002, 61: 297-304. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00109.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative: Managing dyslipidemias in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003, 41 (Suppl 3): S1-S91.Google Scholar
  23. Wanner C, Krane V, Marz W, Olschewski M, Asmus HG, Kramer W, Kuhn KW, Kutemeyer H, Mann JF, Ruf G, Ritz E, Deutsche Diabetes-Dialyse-Studie (4D) Study Group: Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis (4D study): demographic and baseline characteristics. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2004, 27: 259-266. 10.1159/000080241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wanner C: Results of a randomized controlled trial with atorvastatin in dialyzed diabetic patients (4D trial). Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology. St Louis, Missouri, USA, 29 October 2004
  25. Blasetto JW, Stein EA, Brown WV, Chitra R, Raza A: Efficacy of rosuvastatin compared with other statins at selected starting doses in hypercholesterolemic patients and in special population groups. Am J Cardiol. 2003, 91: 3C-10C. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00003-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chapman MJ, Caslake M, Packard C, McTaggart F: New dimension of statin action on apoB atherogenicity. Clin Cardiol. 2003, 26 (Suppl I): I7-I10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Brewer HB: Benefit-risk assessment of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams. Am J Cardiol. 2003, 92 (Suppl 2): 23-29. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00779-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cox D: Regression models and life tablets (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc. 1972, 74: 187-220.Google Scholar
  29. Austin MA, Breslow JL, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Willett WC, Krauss RM: Low-density lipoprotein subclass patterns and risk of myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988, 260: 1917-1921. 10.1001/jama.260.13.1917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Campos H, Genest JJ, Blijlevens E, McNamara JR, Jenner JL, Ordovas JM, Wilson PW, Schaefer EJ: Low density lipoprotein particle size and coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992, 12: 187-195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamarche B, Tchernof A, Moorjani S, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Lupien PJ, Després JP: Small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles as a predictor of the risk of ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Québec Cardiovascular Study. Circulation. 1997, 95: 69-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sacks FM, Alaupovic P, Moye LA, Cole TG, Sussex B, Stamfer MJ, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E: VLDL, apolipoproteins B, CIII, and E, and risk of recurrent coronary events in the Cholesterol Recurrent Events (CARE) trial. Circulation. 2000, 102: 1886-1892.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. O'Neal D, Lee P, Murphy B, Best J: Low-density lipoprotein particle size distribution in end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1996, 27: 84-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Königer M, Quaschning T, Wanner C, Schollmeyer P, Krämer-Guth A: Abnormalities in lipoprotein metabolism in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999, 56 (Suppl 71): S248-S250. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.07166.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Deighan CJ, Caslake MJ, McConnell M, Boulton-Jones JM, Packard CJ: Atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype in end-stage renal failure: origin and extent of small dense low-density lipoprotein formation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000, 35: 852-862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wanner C, Quaschning T: Dyslipidemia and renal disease: pathogenesis and clinical consequences. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2001, 10: 195-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fytili CI, Progia EG, Panagoustsos SA, Thodis ED, Passadakis PS, Sombolos KI, Vargemezis VA: Lipoprotein abnormalities in hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Ren Fail. 2002, 24: 623-630. 10.1081/JDI-120013966.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wanner C, Horl WH, Luley CH, Wieland H: Effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in hypercholesterolemic patients on hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1991, 39: 754-760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nishizawa Y, Shoji T, Emoto M, Kawasaki K, Konishi T, Tabata T, Inoue T, Morii H: Reduction of intermediate density lipoprotein by pravastatin in hemo- and peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 1995, 43: 268-277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Nishizawa Y, Shoji T, Tabata T, Inoue T, Morii H: Effects of lipid-lowering drugs on intermediate-density lipoprotein in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 1999, 56 (Suppl 71): S134-S136. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.07133.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Nishikawa O, Mune M, Miyano M, Nishide T, Maeda A, Kimura K, Takahashi T, Kishino M, Tone Y, Otani H, Ogawa A, Maeda T, Yukawa S: Effect of simvastatin on the lipid profile of hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1999, 56 (Suppl 71): S219-S221. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.07157.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Saltissi D, Morgan C, Rogby RJ, Westhuyzen J: Safety and efficacy of simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing chronic renal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002, 39: 283-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Holdaas H, Fellström B, Jardine AG, Holme I, Nyberg G, Fauchald P, Gronhagen-Riska C, Madsen S, Neumayer HH, Cole E, Maes B, Ambuhl P, Olsson AG, Hartmann A, Solbu DO, Pedersen TR, Assessment of LEscol in Renal Transplantation (ALERT) Study Investigators: Effect of fluvastatin on cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2003, 361: 2024-2031. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13638-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, Cain VA, Blasetto JW: Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvasatatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2003, 92: 152-160. 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00530-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Olsson AG, McTaggart F, Raza A: Rosuvastatin: a highly effective new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2002, 20: 303-328.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Locatelli F, Canaud B, Eckardt K-U, Stenvinkel P, Wanner C, Zoccali C: Oxidative stress in end-stage renal disease: an emerging threat to patient outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003, 18: 1272-1280. 10.1093/ndt/gfg074.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Annuk M, Zilmer M, Lind L, Linde T, Fellstrom B: Oxidative stress and endothelial function in chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001, 12: 2747-2752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenson RS: Statins in atherosclerosis: lipid-lowering agents with antioxidant capabilities. Atherosclerosis. 2004, 173: 1-12. 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00239-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Annuk M, Lind L, Linde T, Fellström B: Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in renal failure in humans. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001, 16: 302-306. 10.1093/ndt/16.2.302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Stalker TJ, Lefer AM, Scalia R: A new HMG-Co A reductase inhibitor, rosuvastatin, exerts anti-inflammatory effects on the microvascular endothelium: the role of mevalonic acid. Br J Pharmacol. 2001, 133: 406-412. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704070.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Foley RN: Clinical epidemiology of cardiac disease in dialysis patients: ventricular hypertrophy, ischemic heart disease, and cardiac failure. Semin Dial. 2003, 16: 111-117. 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2003.160271.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Su SF, Hsiao CL, Chu CW, Lee BC, Lee TM: Effects of pravastatin on left ventricular mass in patients with hyperlipidaemia and essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2000, 86: 514-518. 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01004-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kjekshus J, Pederson TR, Olsson AG, Faergeman O, Pyörälä L: The effects of simvastatin on the incidence of heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease. J Card Fail. 1997, 3: 249-254. 10.1016/S1071-9164(97)90022-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fellström et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement