Skip to main content

Table 3 Chi-square goodness of fit statistic for HARP2, ALTA, EDEN and SAILS

From: Re-analysis of ventilator-free days (VFD) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) studies

Study

Treatment group

  

HARP-2

Placebo

Simvastatin

Estimate (95% CI)

p-value

N

279

258

  

 Logit-Poisson hurdle model

  Logistic sub-model (n (%))a

170 (61.0%)

180 (69.8%)

1.47 (1.03 to 2.12)

0.03

  Count sub-model (Mean ± SD)b

18.7 ± 6.4

17.8 ± 6.8

0.96 (0.91 to 1.01)

0.09

ALTA

Placebo

Albuterol

Estimate (95% CI)

p-value

N

130

152

  

 Logit-Poisson hurdle model

  Logistic sub-model (n (%))

102 (78.5%)

103 (67.8%)

0.55 (0.32 to 0.95)

0.03

  Count sub-model (mean ± SD)

21.1 ± 5.6

21.2 ± 6.0

1.01 (0.95 to 1.07)

0.70

EDEN

Full

Tropic

Estimate (95% CI)

p-value

N

492

508

  

 Logit-Poisson hurdle model

  Logistic sub-model (n (%))

351 (71.3%)

345 (67.9%)

0.89 (0.68 to 1.17)

0.40

  Count sub-model (mean ± SD)

21 ± 5.5

21.6 ± 5.4

1.02 (0.99 to 1.06)

0.11

SAILS

Placebo

Rosuvastatin

Estimate (95% CI)

p-value

N

366

379

  

 Logit-Poisson hurdle model

  Logistic sub-model (n (%))

251 (68.6%)

264 (69.7%)

1.03 (0.75 to 1.40)

0.88

  Count sub-model (mean ± SD)

21.9 ± 5.2

21.6 ± 5.1

0.99 (0.95 to 1.03)

0.60

  1. aLogistic sub-model reports the n (%) of patients with non-zero values and odds ratio (95% CI) and p-value for the Logit-Poisson hurdle model
  2. bCount sub-model reports the mean ± SD, rate ratio (95% CI) and p-value for the logit-Poisson hurdle model