Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between the top five most successful recruitment strategies and the sociodemographic variables age, sex (female) and educational attainment (high education) (n = 391)

From: Participant recruitment, baseline characteristics and at-home-measurements of cardiometabolic risk markers: insights from the Supreme Nudge parallel cluster-randomised controlled supermarket trial

 

Agea, years

Sex

Educational attainment

β

(95% CI)

ORfemales

(95% CI)

ORhigh education

(95% CI)

Recruited via mailing of recruitment flyers and letters (n =  288)

− 1.76

(− 4.29; 0.70)

1.00

(0.60; 1.64)

1.22

(0.76; 1.98)

Recruited via flyers in the supermarket (n = 52)

2.56

(− 0.63; 5.85)

1.91

(0.93; 4.31)

0.72

(0.38; 1.33)

Recruited via media news article (n = 31)

2.33

(− 1.69; 6.44)

1.64

(0.69; 4.51)

0.67

(0.29; 1.45)

Recruited via in-store recruitment (n = 30)

− 0.11

(− 4.19; 4.06)

1.21

(0.52; 3.14)

1.75

(0.81; 3.81)

Recruited via word-of-mouth (n = 24)

− 0.40

(− 4.94; 4.14)

0.51

(0.22; 1.21)

1.01

(0.42; 2.35)

  1. Statistical significant outcomes (p < 0.05) are displayed in bold text. Associations are based on linear multilevel models (age) and logistic multilevel models (sex and education), including a random intercept on the supermarket level. Males are used as reference category in the analyses of sex, and the combination of low and medium educational attainment was used as reference category for the analyses of educational attainment. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval; an = 2 missing values