Outline application (Stage 1) | Full application (Stage 2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Invited | Rejected | Total | Awarded | Rejected | |
Funding committee feedback explicitly mentions progression criteria | (n = 95) | (n = 52) | (n = 43) | (n = 49) | (n = 35) | (n = 14) |
Yes | 22 (23%) | 15 (29%) | 7 (16%) | 11 (22%) | 9 (26%) | 2 (14%) |
Progression criteria stipulated | 10 (45%) | 7 (47%) | 3 (43%) | 7 (64%) | 5 (56%) | 2 (100%) |
Progression criteria not stipulated | 12 (55%) | 8 (53%) | 4 (57%) | 4 (36%) | 4 (44%) | 0 (0%) |
No | 73 (77%) | 37 (71%) | 36 (84%) | 38 (78%) | 26 (74%) | 12 (86%) |
Progression criteria stipulated | 38 (52%) | 17 (46%) | 21 (58%) | 29 (76%) | 21 (81%) | 8 (67%) |
Progression criteria not stipulated | 35 (48%) | 20 (54%) | 15 (42%) | 9 (24%) | 5 (19%) | 4 (33%) |
Details of feedback where stipulated | (n = 22) | (n = 15) | (n = 7) | (n = 11) | (n = 9) | (n = 2) |
Feedback implies progression criteria were not stipulated | 11 (50%) | 7 (47%) | 4 (57%) | 4 (36%) | 4 (44%) | 0 (0%) |
Feedback requests further detail/clarity e.g. numerical thresholds | 8 (36%) | 5 (33%) | 3 (43%) | 3 (27%) | 3 (33%) | 0 (0%) |
Feedback relates to rationale or justification for progression criteria | 3 (14%) | 3 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (36%) | 2 (22%) | 2 (100%) |