Areas of review | Observations |
---|---|
General requirements | ▪ Trial not registered with a PBSL approved clinical trial registry |
• No or incomplete DSMB charter, including membership, the charter of work, study review criteria/stopping rules, curriculum vitae, and conflict of interest details | |
• Completed PBSL CTA application form not available | |
• Pharmacy manual not provided | |
• No contractual agreement between the sponsor and principal investigator | |
• No local principal investigator was recruited | |
Clinical protocol | • No specification for assessment of efficacy and safety |
• No criteria for participant selection | |
• Unclear study endpoints | |
• Studies containing no local sub-investigators and study pharmacists | |
• Favourable opinion from the SLESRC not available | |
• A description of the design of the trial to be conducted was not provided | |
• A description and justification of the trial treatment and the dosage and dosage regimen of the investigational product were not provided | |
• A detailed description of the “stopping rules” or “discontinuation criteria” is unavailable. | |
• Valid insurance certificate for the study duration that must be provided before study initiation is not available. | |
• The informed consent information sheet does not have details of the Chairman of the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee for participants to contact if they have ethical issues. | |
• Procedures for monitoring subject compliance not provided | |
• The sponsor intends to conduct a phase 2 clinical trial, but the phase 1 trial report was not available | |
• No details of causality assessment parameters and serious adverse events/reaction toxicity grading such as those for haematology and biochemistry | |
• No evidence of GCP training for the principal investigator and other key staff | |
• No details of IP data handling and recording keeping | |
Quality review | • Process validation protocol and report were not available |
• Evidence of Good Manufacturing Practice compliance for the manufacturing site(s) of IP and excipients not available | |
• Analytical Procedures and batch analyses for IP and excipients not provided | |
• No analysis report of reference standards, including test methods, acceptance criteria, and results | |
• Post-approval stability protocol and stability commitment for ongoing stability studies of IP not provided | |
• Sample of labels not available | |
• The product dossier for the placebo was not provided | |
• The parameters, test methods, specifications or acceptance criteria and results for the pre-master virus seed are not available | |
• Genotypic and phenotypic characterisation of the master virus seed was not available | |
• No read-outs or tracings for characterisation of impurities | |
• No tracings or read-outs for analytical method validation | |
Biostatistics review | • Criteria for the termination of the trial are not available |
• Timing of any planned interim analysis though, was planned not provided | |
• Incomplete statistical analysis plan submitted before data lock, with no authors’ name and signature, version number and date, and no inclusion and exclusion criteria | |
Nonclinical review | • Investigator’s brochure not provided |
• No developmental and reproductive toxicity data to support use in pregnancy |