Skip to main content

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes

From: Does m-health-based exercise (guidance plus education) improve efficacy in patients with chronic low-back pain? A preliminary report on the intervention’s significance

Measure by assessment

Mean (SD)

Follow-up time

Main effect of time

Main effect of group

Interaction effects

Baseline

6-week follow-up

18-week follow-up

Ftime

Ptime

Fgroup

Pgroup

FGroup × Time

PGroup × Time

RMDQ

         

 Intervention group

4.8 (2.7)

4.0 (3.1)

3.1 (2.8)

14.256

0.000

0.813

0.313

0.043

0.952

 Control group

4.1 (2.5)

3.3 (2.1)

2.5 (1.7)

Average (NRS)

         

 Intervention group

4.7 (1.8)

3.4 (1.5)

3.4 (2.0)

6.394

0.004

0.515

0.478

0.477

0.624

 Control group

4.1 (1.7)

3.3 (1.2)

3.2 (1.1)

Current (NRS)

         

 Intervention group

3.4 (1.8)

2.9 (1.5)

2.8 (1.8)

3.034

0.061

0.187

0.668

0.065

0.937

 Control group

3.3 (1.8)

2.6 (1.6)

2.5 (1.3)

Most severe (NRS)

         

 Intervention group

6.6 (2.0)

5.5 (1.8)

4.3 (2.0)

27.163

0.000

0.457

0.503

0.089

0.891

 Control group

6.2 (1.8)

5.2 (1.5)

4.1 (2.6)

SDS

         

 Intervention group

47.9 (11.5)

46.3 (11.7)

46.7 (9.7)

1.179

0.313

2.580

0.117

2.670

0.078

 Control group

41.0 (7.3)

45.0 (12.4)

40.5 (9.9)

GAD-7

         

 Intervention group

4.7 (2.8)

4.2 (2.7)

4.2 (2.9)

1.529

0.224

0.104

0.749

3.106

0.052

 Control group

3.3 (3.3)

5.2 (4.5)

3.7 (4.5)

PCS (SF-36)

         

 Intervention group

39.5 (6.4)

43.6 (8.0)

45.8 (8.1)

15.459

0.000

2.456

0.126

1.283

0.282

 Control group

44.2 (7.9)

45.1 (6.7)

49.7 (8.7)

MCS (SF-36)

         

 Intervention group

48.3 (10.2)

47.0 (11.4)

48.0 (10.6)

0.860

0.420

0.790

0.380

0.115

0.877

 Control group

51.4 (10.2)

48.7 (11.2)

51.2 (13.2)