Skip to main content

Table 1 Findings broken down by study type

From: Patient-centred outcomes are under-reported in the critical care burns literature: a systematic review

Study type

No. of studies

Median no. of patients

Patient-centred primary outcome, n (%)

Median LFU (days)

OMERACT, n (%)

Falder outcome, n (%)

Mortality

Life impact

Resource/economic

Pathophys.

RCT

53

43

20 (37)

3

24 (45)

18 (33)

13 (25)

41 (77)

17 (32)

Pseudo-RCT

13

31

3 (23)

7

9 (69)

0 (0)

4 (30)

12 (92)

2 (15)

CSWCC

19

30

6 (31)

28

11 (58)

6 (32)

5 (26)

14 (74)

5 (26)

ISWCC

13

40

3 (23)

12

10 (77)

3 (23)

8 (62)

11 (85)

2 (15)

  1. RCT randomised control trial, Pseudo-RCT Pseudo-randomised control trial, CSWCC clinical study with concurrent control, ISWCC intervention study without concurrent control, LFU longest follow-up