Skip to main content

Table 3 The severity of dysmenorrhea assessed by the VAS in two groups of study in the control cycle, the first intervention, and the second intervention cycle

From: Comparison of effect of auriculotherapy and mefenamic acid on the severity and systemic symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized clinical trial

Time

Auriculotherapy group (n = 41)

Mefenamic acid group (n = 42)

Unadjusted P value (between groups)

Adjusted P value (between groups)

fES (between)

 

Mean ± SDa

bAdjusted mean (95% CI)

mean ± SD

bAdjusted mean (95% CI)

   

cControl cycle

5.08 ± 1.74

-

5.39 ± 1.73

 

0.423

-

-

d1st cycle

3.34 ± 1.81

3 (2.42 to 3.58)

4.27 ± 2.33

4.59 (4.02 to 5.16)

0.046

< 0.001

0.15

d2nd cycle

2.82 ± 1.77

2.63 (2.06 to 3.21)

3.85 ± 1.98

4.03 (3.46 to 4.59)

0.015

0.001

0.12

eP value (within groups)

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

    
  1. aStandard deviation, badjusted mean using analysis of covariance after controlling for painkiller consumption variable, cindependent t test, dunivariate ANCOVA, erepeated measures ANOVA, and feffect size (ES) based on partial eta square