Skip to main content

Table 3 PV: level of implementation (fidelity checklist)

From: Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)

PV’s behavior

Level of implementation observed, N (%)

Low/not observed

Small

Medium

High

General observations on the organization of the teaching

 1. Were the materials ready for each activity?

   

138 (100)

 2. Was the PV organized and familiar with the manual for teaching the PAP?

  

5 (3.6)

133 (96.4)

 3. Was the PV teaching according to the teaching manual?

   

138 (100)

 4. Did the PV complete all parts of the session?

  

1 (0.7)

137 (99.3)

 5. Did the PV provide opportunities for the participants to respond?

   

138 (100)

 6. Did the PV use session activities?

   

138 (100)

On encouragement

 1. Did the PV use the principle of pain self-management as laid out in the teaching manual?

   

138 (100)

 2. Did the PV teach the residents to maintain functional activities, e.g., grooming and walking even in situations of pain?

   

138 (100)

 3. Did the PV explain to the participants the importance of using various strategies that can help to relieve pain and pain-related situations?

   

138 (100)

 4. Did the PV practice non-pharmacological strategies with the participants?

   

138 (100)

 5. Did the PV encourage the participants to self-practice the strategies for pain relief that they learned in class?

   

138 (100)