Skip to main content

Table 4 Triangulation protocol

From: Protocol for a process evaluation of an external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care: the PolyPrime study

Step

Activity

1. Sorting

Sort findings from each data set to identify the key findings that address each research question of interest to determine areas of content overlap and divergence. A list of the key themes will be compiled and added to the convergence coding matrix

2. Convergence coding

Compare the findings to determine the degree of convergence of (a) essence of the meaning and prominence (e.g. the number of participants mentioning a theme) of the themes presented and (b) specific examples provided in relation to each theme. Characterise the degree and type of convergence using the following concurrence coding scheme within theme areas:

 Convergence coding scheme

  Agreement

There is full agreement between the sets of results on both elements of comparison (e.g. meaning and prominence are the same and specific examples provided are the same)

  Partial agreement

There is agreement on one but not both components (e.g. the meaning or prominence of themes is the same or specific examples provided are the same)

  Silence

One set of results covers the theme or example, whereas the other set of results is silent on the theme or example

  Dissonance

There is disagreement between the sets of results on both elements of comparison (e.g. meaning and prominence are different and specific examples provided are different)

3. Convergence assessment

Review convergence coding matrix to provide a global assessment of the level of convergence. Document when and where researchers have different perspectives on convergence or dissonance of findings

4. Completeness comparison

Compare the findings from the convergence coding matrix to create an overarching summary of the findings, highlighting both unique and similar contributions to each research question

5. Researcher comparison

Determine the degree of agreement among researchers on triangulated findings. Any disagreements will be resolved by consensus through discussion with another researcher

6. Feedback

Feedback of triangulated results to the wider research team for review and clarification

  1. Adapted from [31]