Blinded expert central photography review | Kappak | PABAKk | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Healthy, altered or Cat. 1 PU | Cat. 2, 3, 4 or U | Unable to determine | Overall | |||||
Overall | Independent clinical assessor | Healthy, altered or category 1 PU | 254 (89.4%) | 7 (2.5%) | 3 (1.1%) | 264 (93.0%) | 0.53 | 0.93 |
Category 2, 3, 4 or U | 2 (0.7%) | 6 (2.1%) | 2 (0.7%) | 10 (3.5%) | ||||
N/A | 4 (1.4%) | 2 (0.7%) | 1 (0.4%) | 7 (2.5%)l | ||||
Missing | 3 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||
Overall | 263 (92.6%) | 15 (5.3%) | 6 (2.1%) | 284 (100.0%) | ||||
APM | Independent clinical assessor | Healthy, altered or category 1 PU | 110 (87.3%) | 3 (2.4%) | 1 (0.8%) | 114 (90.5%) | 0.59 | 0.92 |
Category 2, 3, 4 or U | 2 (1.6%) | 4 (3.2%) | 2 (1.6%) | 8 (6.4%) | ||||
N/A | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.6%) | ||||
Missing | 2 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.6%) | ||||
Overall | 115 (91.3%) | 8 (6.4%) | 3 (2.4%) | 126 (100.0%) | ||||
HSFM | Independent clinical assessor | Healthy, altered or category 1 PU | 144 (91.1%) | 4 (2.5%) | 2 (1.3%) | 150 (94.9%) | 0.49 | 0.95 |
Category 2, 3, 4 or U | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.3%) | ||||
N/A | 3 (1.9%) | 1 (0.6%) | 1 (0.6%) | 5 (3.2%) | ||||
Missing | 1 (0.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.6%) | ||||
Overall | 148 (93.1%) | 7 (4.4%) | 3 (1.9%) | 158 (100.0%) |