Skip to main content

Table 3 Baseline HIV prevalence/incidence, stability/instability and responsiveness/resistance patterns across communities by HPTN 071 (PopART) study arm

From: How ‘place’ matters for addressing the HIV epidemic: evidence from the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised controlled trial in Zambia and South Africa

Arm/site/triplet

Baseline HIV prevalence

HIV incidence*

Stability/instability

Responsiveness/resistance

ARM A

 Z2

Triplet 1

16.30% (14.2, 18.7)

1.64 (1.09, 2.38)

Mixed

Resistant

 Z5

Triplet 2

17.40% (15.8, 19.2)

1.57 (1.08, 2.2)

Unstable

Mixed

 Z8

Triplet 3

18.30% (16.5, 20.3)

1.36 (0.86, 2.04)

Stable

Resistant

 Z10

Triplet 4

25.90% (23.9, 28)

1.93 (1.39, 2.62)

Unstable

Resistant

 S14

Triplet 5

29.90% (28, 31.9)

2.36 (1.65, 3.27)

Mixed

Resistant

 S16

Triplet 6

24.90% (23.1, 26.9)

1.43 (0.93, 2.1)

Unstable

Resistant

 S19

Triplet 7

10.8%

0.5%

Unstable

Resistant

ARM B

 Z1

Triplet 1

17.0% (14.7, 19.4)

0.94 (0.57, 1.48)

Stable

Responsive

 Z6

Triplet 2

23.4% (21.7, 25.1)

1.2 (0.8, 1.72)

Stable

Mixed

 Z9

Triplet 3

21.5% (19.4, 23.7)

1.3 (0.81, 1.97)

Mixed

Mixed

 Z11

Triplet 4

24.2% (22.1, 26.4)

1.13 (0.68, 1.76)

Mixed

Mixed

 SA13

Triplet 5

29.2% (27.4, 31.1)

1.8 (1.24, 2.53)

Mixed

Resistant

 SA18

Triplet 6

19.9% (18.3, 21.5)

1.24 (0.81, 1.82)

Mixed

Responsive

 SA20

Triplet 7

9.9% (8.7, 11.3)

0.4 (0.19, 0.74)

Stable

Responsive

ARM C

 Z3

Triplet 1

21.9% (20, 23.9)

1.17 (0.75, 1.74)

Stable

Mixed

 Z4

Triplet 2

18.1% (16.4, 20)

1.48 (1.02, 2.07)

Stable

Responsive

 Z7

Triplet 3

19.6% (18, 21.4)

1.63 (1.1, 2.33)

Mixed

Resistant

 Z12

Triplet 4

28.1% (25.5, 30.9)

2.39 (1.69, 3.29)

Unstable

Mixed

 SA15

Triplet 5

28.0% (26, 30.1)

2.15 (1.43, 3.1)

Mixed

Resistant

 SA17

Triplet 6

35.7% (33.6, 37.8)

2.31 (1.58, 3.27)

Unstable

Resistant

 SA21

Triplet 7

3.0% (2.2, 4)

0.65 (0.36, 1.09)

Stable

Resistant

  1. *HIV incidence confidence intervals were wide since incidence estimates for individual communities were based on small numbers of events