Skip to main content

Table 6 Listing of all unique measurement methods used to assess the most common outcomes in the Dodd’s taxonomy life impact #32a, Delivery of care (Satisfaction / patient preference) category. Only those domains where there was more than one report of the outcome measurement instrument are selected for reporting here. See Additional file 10 for full details

From: Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in designs of clinical trials for interventions that seek to restore bilateral and binaural hearing in adults with unilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (‘single-sided deafness’)

Measurement methods (n > 1) split by outcome domains and type of method

Primary outcomes

Secondary outcomes

Device benefit, PROM

 Multi-item questionnaire

Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)

6

-

Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP)

4

-

Multi-item, multi-domain Questionnaire (author's own)

3

-

 Numerical rating scale

International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), single item on benefit

1

1

Visual Analogue Scale (not specified)

1

-

Device use, investigator administered

 Technical and lab measures

Device log (not specified)

2

-

Device log average usage (hrs / day)

3

-

Device use, PROM

 Multi-item questionnaire

Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP), hearing aid use subscale

2

-

Satisfaction, PROM

 Multi-item questionnaire

Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile (GHABP), various subscales

1

2

Multi-item, multi-domain questionnaire (author's own)

2

-

Aversiveness, PROM

 Multi-item questionnaire

Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) aversiveness subscale

5

6