Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences in the residuals of secondary outcomes between the intervention and control arms at endpoint controlling for baseline prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics

From: Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men’s perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial

  Baseline Endpoint Differences in residuals at endpoint (95% CI) P value
  Intervention Control Intervention Control    
Non-partner rape (n (%)) 402 (34.33) 409 (34.34) 190 (27.86) 201 (30.04) −0.001 (−0.13 to 0.13) 0.98
Transactional sex (n (%)) 529 (49.03) 515 (47.60) 298 (42.69) 282 (40.93) −0.05 (− 0.19 to 0.09) 0.47
AUDIT (mean ± SD) 8.53 ± 6.43 8.62 ± 6.58 7.80 ± 6.40 7.73 ± 6.66 −0.06 (−0.16 to 0.04) 0.23
Problematic alcohol use (AUDIT 8) (n (%)) 528 (57.83) 526 (57.36) 421 (55.39) 380 (52.13) −0.09 (− 0.16 to 0.01) 0.02
CES-D (mean ± SD) 16.53 ± 8.26 17.15 ± 8.42 16.54 ± 8.34 16.93 ± 9.30 −0.04 (−0.11 to 0.02) 0.18
Possible depression CES-D 16 (n (%)) 500 (41.12) 543 (43.86) 345 (28.37) 326 (26.33) −0.11 (− 0.28 to 0.07) 0.22
GEMS (mean ± SD) 22.87 ± 6.60 23.16 ± 6.06 22.81 ± 6.23 22.05 ± 6.35 −0.05 (−0.12 to 0.03) 0.19
SRPS (mean ± SD) 19.70 ± 5.54 19.92 ± 5.16 19.38 ± 5.02 19.43 ± 5.32 −0.03 (− 0.13 to 0.07) 0.59
Parenting (parent–child conflict tactics scale) (n (%)) 315 (56.55) 321 (59.01) 230 (56.79) 245 (58.47) 0.06 (−0.13 to 0.25) 0.53
Social cohesion (mean ± SD) 14.07 ± 3.11 14.43 ± 2.88 14.80 ± 3.16 14.85 ± 3.11 −0.06 (− 0.14 to 0.02) 0.13
  1. AUDIT Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression, CI confidence interval, GEMS Gender-Equitable Men Scale, SD standard deviation, SRPS Sexual Relationship Power Scale