Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences in the residuals of secondary outcomes between the intervention and control arms at endpoint controlling for baseline prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics

From: Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men’s perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial

 

Baseline

Endpoint

Differences in residuals at endpoint (95% CI)

P value

 

Intervention

Control

Intervention

Control

   

Non-partner rape (n (%))

402 (34.33)

409 (34.34)

190 (27.86)

201 (30.04)

−0.001

(−0.13 to 0.13)

0.98

Transactional sex (n (%))

529 (49.03)

515 (47.60)

298 (42.69)

282 (40.93)

−0.05

(− 0.19 to 0.09)

0.47

AUDIT (mean ± SD)

8.53 ± 6.43

8.62 ± 6.58

7.80 ± 6.40

7.73 ± 6.66

−0.06

(−0.16 to 0.04)

0.23

Problematic alcohol use (AUDIT 8) (n (%))

528 (57.83)

526 (57.36)

421 (55.39)

380 (52.13)

−0.09

(− 0.16 to 0.01)

0.02

CES-D (mean ± SD)

16.53 ± 8.26

17.15 ± 8.42

16.54 ± 8.34

16.93 ± 9.30

−0.04

(−0.11 to 0.02)

0.18

Possible depression CES-D 16 (n (%))

500 (41.12)

543 (43.86)

345 (28.37)

326 (26.33)

−0.11

(− 0.28 to 0.07)

0.22

GEMS (mean ± SD)

22.87 ± 6.60

23.16 ± 6.06

22.81 ± 6.23

22.05 ± 6.35

−0.05

(−0.12 to 0.03)

0.19

SRPS (mean ± SD)

19.70 ± 5.54

19.92 ± 5.16

19.38 ± 5.02

19.43 ± 5.32

−0.03

(− 0.13 to 0.07)

0.59

Parenting (parent–child conflict tactics scale) (n (%))

315 (56.55)

321 (59.01)

230 (56.79)

245 (58.47)

0.06

(−0.13 to 0.25)

0.53

Social cohesion (mean ± SD)

14.07 ± 3.11

14.43 ± 2.88

14.80 ± 3.16

14.85 ± 3.11

−0.06

(− 0.14 to 0.02)

0.13

  1. AUDIT Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression, CI confidence interval, GEMS Gender-Equitable Men Scale, SD standard deviation, SRPS Sexual Relationship Power Scale