Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant and insertion characteristics at insertion

From: A comparison of hydrophobic polyurethane and polyurethane peripherally inserted central catheter: results from a feasibility randomized controlled trial

 

n

Intervention

Control

Total

Group sizea

111

56 (50)

55 (50)

111 (100)

Female gender

111

28 (50)

29 (53)

57 (51)

Age (years)b

111

59 (15)

62 (16)

61 (16)

Body mass indexb

111

28 (10)

31 (16)

30 (13)

Comorbidities

111

   

 None

 

2 (4)

1 (2)

3 (3)

 One

 

7 (12)

8 (15)

15 (14)

 Two

 

9 (16)

5 (9)

14 (13)

 Three

 

7 (12)

6 (11)

13 (12)

 Four or more

 

31 (55)

35 (64)

66 (59)

History ofc

 Clot

109

17 (30)

17 (32)

34 (31)

 Antithrombotic therapy

108

46 (84)

48 (91)

94 (87)

Diagnosis at admission

111

   

 Surgical

 

39 (70)

35 (64)

74 (67)

 Medical

 

12 (21)

15 (27)

27 (24)

 Other

 

5 (9)

5 (9)

10 (9)

Infection at time of recruitment

111

38 (68)

31 (56)

69 (62)

Wound at time of recruitment

111

35 (62)

27 (49)

62 (56)

Side of insertion: non-dominant arm

110

33 (60)

35 (64)

68 (62)

PICC placement:

110

   

 Basilic

 

46 (84)

40 (73)

86 (78)

 Brachial

 

8 (15)

12 (22)

20 (18)

 Other

 

1 (2)

3 (5)

4 (4)

Catheter size:

110

   

 5 Fr

 

54 (98)

53 (96)

107 (97)

 4 Fr

 

1 (2)

2 (4)

3 (3)

Lumens

110

   

 Two

 

54 (98)

53 (96)

107 (97)

 One

 

1 (2)

2 (4)

3 (3)

Difficult insertion

111

20 (36)

13 (24)

33 (30)

Number of attempts

110

   

 One (first time success)

 

40 (71)

42 (78)

82 (75)

 Two

 

9 (16)

6 (11)

15 (14)

 Three or more

 

7 (12)

6 (11)

13 (12)

Inserted by

110

   

 Radiographer

 

27 (49)

26 (47)

53 (48)

 Nurse

 

21 (38)

21 (38)

42 (38)

 Doctor

 

7 (13)

8 (15)

15 (14)

Ease of insertiond,e

108

7.5 (5.0–9.0)

10.0 (7.0–10.0)

8.0 (5.0–10.0)

Satisfaction with insertion kitd,e

108

7.0 (3.0–8.0)

10.0 (10.0–10.0)

9.0 (7.0–10.0)

PICC inserter level of experience

108

   

 No history of insertion

 

16 (29)

1 (2)

17 (16)

 One to ten devices inserted

 

37 (66)

12 (23)

49 (45)

 11 or more devices inserted

 

3 (5)

39 (75)

42 (39)

  1. Frequencies and column percentages shown unless noted otherwise
  2. n number of non-missing observations
  3. aRow percentages shown
  4. bMean (standard deviation)
  5. cMultiple responses possible per participant
  6. dMedian (25–75th percentiles) shown
  7. eOn a 0 to 10 scale, 0 = worst and 10 = best