Skip to main content

Table 3 Focus of the outcome reporting recommendations (n = 1758) identified within 244 eligible documents

From: Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review

 

N (%)

Trial document typea

 Trial reports

781 (44.4)

 Trial protocols

758 (43.1)

 General trial reporting

229 (13.0)

 Ethics boards documents for trial submissions

21 (1.2)

 Study proposal for a trial in grant application(s)

1 (0.06)

Trial type

 No specific focus explicitly stated

1369 (77.9)

 All trials

124 (7.1)

 Specific trial focusa

265 (15.1)

  Phasea

102 (5.8)

   Pilot/feasibility

33 (1.9)

   II

45 (2.6)

   III

64 (3.6)

  Designa

102 (5.8)

N-of-1

44 (2.5)

   Cluster

16 (0.9)

   Non-inferiority

14 (0.8)

   Equivalence

11 (0.6)

   Within person

10 (0.6)

   Parallel

9 (0.5)

   Crossover

6 (0.3)

   Adaptive

6 (0.3)

   Superiority

5 (0.3)

   Pragmatic

3 (0.2)

Outcomes

 No specific focus explicitly stated

911 (51.8)

 All outcomes

11 (0.6)

 Specific outcome focusa

836 (47.6)

  Outcome classificationa

469 (26.7)

   Primary

458 (26.1)

   Secondary

326 (18.5)

   “Important”

7 (0.4)

   Tertiary/exploratory

6 (0.3)

  Outcome typea

474 (27.0)

   Patient-reported outcome

288 (16.4)

   Harm/adverse event

116 (6.6)

   Biological marker

41 (2.3)

   Efficacy outcome

33 (1.9)

   Composite outcome

13 (0.7)

   Survival/time-to-event outcome

11 (0.6)

   Surrogate outcome

8 (0.5)

   Clinician-reported outcome

7 (0.4)

   Continuous outcome

4 (0.2)

   Binary outcome

3 (0.2)

   “Unintended” outcome

1 (0.06)

  1. aNot mutually exclusive