Skip to main content

Table 1 General characteristics of the included documents (n = 244)

From: Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review

 

N (%)

Document publisher

 Academic journal

176 (72.1)

 Hospital/university/research organization

31 (12.7)

 Government

21 (8.6)

 Non-governmental organization

16 (6.6)

Document type

 Literature review

74 (30.3)

  Assessment of reporting completenessa

39 (16.0)

  Systematic/scoping review

28 (11.5)

  Other type of review

7 (2.9)

 Recommendation/guidance document

59 (24.2)

 Commentary/opinion piece/letter

30 (12.3)

 Reporting guideline

34 (13.9)

 Trial protocol template

16 (6.6)

 Research ethics board document

11 (4.5)

 Regulatory document

6 (2.5)

 Website

5 (2.0)

 Government report

3 (1.2)

 Otherb

6 (2.5)

Publication year

 2008–2010

35 (14.3)

 2011–2013

69 (28.2)

 2014–2016

70 (28.7)

 2017–2018c

56 (23.0)

 Not reported

14 (5.7)

Language

 English

243 (99.6)

 French

1 (0.4)

 Dutch

0 (0)

  1. aIncludes any type of literature review that aimed to assess the completeness of reporting in the included articles from either an original review or a secondary analyses of documents included in a prior review
  2. bIncludes reporting guideline development protocols (n = 2) and a reporting guideline pilot study, checklist for peer-reviewers, statistical analysis plan template, and article evaluating an outcome measurement instrument (n = 1 each)
  3. cUntil time of search (19 March 2018)