Skip to main content

Table 3 Normalization perceptions

From: Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study

Normalization perceptions

Academic medical center (n = 94)

Community group practice (n = 43)

Safety net system (n = 46)

Total (N = 183)

Missing (n)

12

0

3

15

SDM Integration: 1 (worst) to 10 (best); mean (SD)

 Feels familiar

7.2 (2.6)

5.9 (3.0)

5.8 (2.7)

6.5 (2.8)

 Currently part of normal practice

6.1 (3.6)

5.3 (3.5)

5.2 (3.2)

5.7 (3.5)

 Will become part of practice

7.7 (2.3)

7.5 (2.4)

7.4 (1.9)

7.5 (2.2)

NPT domains: agree/strongly agree (n, %)

 Coherence

  Differs from normal work

62 (76)

30 (70)

30 (70)

122 (73)

  Shared understanding by staff

68 (83)

35 (81)

33 (77)

136 (81)

  Understand how SDM affects my work

67 (82)

37 (86)

40 (93)

144 (86)

  I see the value

76 (93)

39 (91)

39 (91)

154 (92)

 Cognitive participation

  There are drivers

57 (70)

35 (81)

34 (79)

126 (75)

  I believe it’s a legitimate part of work

73 (89)

39 (91)

37 (86)

149 (89)

  Open to working with colleagues to improve

80 (98)

42 (98)

40 (93)

162 (96)

  Will continue to support

78 (95)

39 (91)

38 (88)

155 (92)

 Collective action

  Easy to integrate

69 (84)

31 (72)

30 (70)

130 (77)

  Disruption of working relationshipsa

9 (11)

2 (5)

2 (5)

13 (8)

  Confidence in others’ abilities

58 (71)

30 (70)

29 (67)

117 (70)

  Assigned to people with appropriate skills

59 (72)

35 (81)

26 (61)

120 (71)

  Sufficient training

57 (70)

29 (67)

33 (77)

119 (71)

  Sufficient resources

64 (78)

30 (70)

30 (70)

124 (74)

  Support from management

61 (74)

33 (77)

27 (63)

121 (72)

  1. NPT NPT Normalization Process Theory, SDM Shared decision making
  2. aInverse coding used for items with negative framing