Skip to main content

Table 5 Trial and recruitment characteristics that significantly affected randomisation rate for included stroke rehabilitation RCTs

From: A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials

  

Trial feature

Kruskal–Wallis

P

RCTs

 

Subgrouping (median)

  

Randomisation rate

Trial characteristic

Stroke survivor living context

X2(3) = 10.11

0.018

239

 

Community (48%)*

  

General hospital (38%)

Stroke-specific environment (27%)

Stage of rehabilitation

X2(5) = 16.64

0.002

292

 

Acute (23%)

  

Acute–subacute (25%)

Subacute (29%)

Subacute–chronic (26%)

Chronic (48%)*

Recruitment characteristic

Recruitment strategy

X2(2) = 10.34

0.006

167

 

Screening stroke survivors in the community (49%)*

  

Screening admissions (22%)

Screening inpatients (35%)

Number of recruiters

X2(2) = 6.06

0.048

133

 

Single recruiter (29%)

  

Two or three recruiters (40%)*

Four or more recruiters (21%)

  1. * Best recruitment condition
  2. Kruskal–Wallis = appropriate statistics for Kruskal–Wallis test, p = significance level, RCTs = number of RCTs contributing to this finding, X2 = chi squared test