Skip to main content

Table 3 Trial and recruitment characteristics for the included 512 stroke rehabilitation RCTs

From: A systematic review of the efficiency of recruitment to stroke rehabilitation randomised controlled trials

 

Trial characteristic categories

Number of RCTs in this category (percentage of total, n = 512)

Publication date

2009 and before

250 (49%)

2010 and after

262 (51%)

Trial size

21 or fewer participants

128 (25%)

22–34 participants

134 (26%)

35–60 participants

121 (24%)

61–99 participants

66 (13%)

100 or more participants

63 (12%)

Stroke survivor residence

Community

100 (19%)

Hospital

96 (19%)

Rehabilitation or stroke-specific environment

192 (37%)

Othera

19 (4%)

Unreported

105 (21%)

Type of intervention

Using a technological aid (any form of equipment to assist the rehabilitation intervention)

270 (59%)

Not using a technological aid

189 (41%)

Unreported

53 (10%)

Funding source

Research council

102 (20%)

Government

65 (13%)

Charity

51 (10%)

University

38 (7%)

No funding

50 (9%)

Industrya

15 (3%)

Combinationa

22 (4%)

Unreported

169 (33%)

Ethics approval

Hospital/health board

191 (37%)

University

158 (31%)

Unreported

163 (32%)

Targeted impairment

Arm function

169 (33%)

Leg function

94 (18%)

Overall disability

137 (27%)

Cognitive or vision

61 (12%)

Unreported

51 (10%)

Stage of rehabilitation

Acute (0–1 month)

82 (16%)

Acute–subacute

43 (8%)

Subacute (1–6 months)

62 (12%)

Subacute–chronic

37 (7%)

Chronic (> 6 months)

193 (38%)

Any stagea

13 (3%)

Unreported

82 (16%)

Control condition

Inactive control (form of control that lasts for the same duration as the intervention but does not have a known effect [17])

55 (11%)

Active control (typically a comparison intervention which is known to have an effect but would not be characterised as standard care [18])

246 (48%)

Usual care (standard care received)

159 (31%)

Unreported

52 (10%)

Continent of recruitment

Europe

176 (34%)

Asia

137 (27%)

North America

102 (20%)

Australasia (Australia or New Zealand)a

31 (6%)

Other

66 (13%)

Recruitment strategy

Screening admissions

100 (20%)

Screening inpatients

81 (16%)

Screening community dwelling stroke survivors

42 (8%)

Screening dischargea

14 (3%)

Screening databasesa

24 (5%)

Referralsa

11 (2%)

Advertisementsa

23 (4%)

Combination of the abovea

31 (6%)

Unreported

186 (36%)

Profession of recruiter

Medical professional

47 (9%)

Allied health professional or nurse

89 (17%)

Research team member

49 (10%)

Combination of the abovea

20 (4%)

Unreported

307 (60%)

Number of recruiters

One

57 (11%)

Two or three

59 (11%)

Four or more

38 (7%)

Unreported

358 (70%)

Number of recruiters per site

One recruiter covering multiple sites

18 (4%)

One recruiter per site

47 (9%)

Between one and two recruiters

38 (7%)

More than two recruiters

30 (6%)

Unreported

379 (74%)

  1. aRemoved from subgroup analysis due to lack of numerical balance increasing risk of producing misleading results