Skip to main content

Table 9 Sensitivity analyses at 1-year follow-up

From: Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects, 1-year follow-up: a cluster-randomised trial

 Adjusted differenceaOdds ratio
Mean score
 Primary analysisMean difference: 16.7%
(95% CI, 13.9% to 19.5%)
P < 0.00001
 Weighted analysisMean difference: 16.7%
(95% CI, 13.9% to 19.5%)
 Lee bounds6.4% to 26.6%
(95% CI, 6.6% to 26.5%)
Passing score (≥ 13 of 24 correct answers)
 Primary analysis39.5%
(95% CI, 29.9% to 47.5%)
(95% CI, 4.00 to 8.33)
P < 0.0001
 Weighted analysis40.9%
(95% CI, 31.0% to 49.4%)
(95% CI, 4.17 to 9.09)
P < 0.0001
  1. aThe adjusted difference is based on mixed models with a random effects term for the clusters and the stratification variables modelled as fixed effects, using logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes and linear regression for continuous outcomes. The odds ratios from the logistic regressions for passing scores have been converted to differences based on the intervention school proportions and the odds ratios calculated using the intervention schools as the reference (the inverse of the odds ratios shown here)