Skip to main content

Table 3 Patients with level-3 (red) MEWS vital signs recordings and responses in two trial arms

From: Testing effectiveness of the revised Cape Town modified early warning and SBAR systems: a pilot pragmatic parallel group randomised controlled trial

Number of level-3 MEWS vital signs recordings*

Intervention arm

(n = 150)

Number (%)

Control arm

(n = 142)

Number (%)

OR (95% CI)

P value

0

105 (70.0)

61 (43.0)

  

1

32 (21.3)

62 (43.7)

  

2

12 (8.0)

16 (11.3)

  

3

1 (0.7)

1 (0.7)

  

4

0

2 (1.4)

  

Patients with any red MEWS

45 (30.0)

81 (57.0)

0.32 (0.20–0.52)

< 0.001

Assistance summoned

 Yes

2 (4.4)

11 (13.6)

  

 No but should have

43 (95.6)

70 (86.4)

0.29 (0.06–1.39)

0.03, 0.02 with Yates’ correction

  1. MEWS modified early warning score
  2. P value reporting, see “Table 2” notes
  3. aWe excluded:
  4. • Temperature recordings, due to inconsistent measurement techniques and falsely low readings
  5. • Urine output due to low numbers of recordings and almost zero recording of volume in both arms