Skip to main content

Table 2 Understanding of randomisation along with treatment preferences and outcomes

From: Patient experiences of participation in a radical thoracic surgical trial: findings from the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery Trial 2 (MARS 2)

Participant number

Treatment preference

Randomisation outcome

Understanding of randomisation

1

Surgery

Surgery

Good

2

Surgery

Surgery

Good

3

Surgery

Surgery

Not clear. Participant initially described that he could have received either treatment but later in the interview stated that he had been randomised to surgery as the chemotherapy was not working for him.

4

Surgery

Surgery

Good

5

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy

Good

6

No preference

Surgery

Poor. Patient thought that doctors make the decision and that the trial is comparing types of surgery

7

No preference

Surgery

Not clear from discussion

8

No preference

Surgery

Poor. Patient thought that doctors make the decision

9

Surgery

Chemotherapy

Good

10

Surgery

Chemotherapy

Good

11

Chemotherapy

Surgery

Poor. Patient thought that a computer makes the decision by assessing their individual situation from the information provided

12

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy

Poor. Patient thought that a computer makes the decision by assessing their individual situation from the information provided

13

Surgery

Chemotherapy

Good

14

Chemotherapy

Surgery

Poor. Patient thought that doctors make the decision and that the trial is comparing types of surgery

15

No preference

Chemotherapy

Good