Skip to main content

Table 1 Health-related quality of life assessments

From: Cognitively-Based Compassion Training versus cancer health education to improve health-related quality of life in survivors of solid tumor cancers and their informal caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial

 

Instrument name

# items

Response options

Other information

Depression

PROMIS short-form Depression-8aa

8

Never, rarely, sometimes, often, always

Alpha 0.92; developed with IRT [40]

Anxiety

PROMIS short-form Anxiety-8

8

Never, rarely, sometimes, often, always

Very good reliability; developed with IRT [40]

Fatigue

PROMIS short-form 7-item Fatigue

7

Never, rarely, sometimes, often, always

Alpha 0.87; developed with IRT [40]

Empathy

Interpersonal Reactivity Index

28

5 responses from “does not describe me well” to “describes me very well”

Four subscales: perspective-taking, empathic concern, personal distress, and fantasy); good reliability [41,42,43]

Social connection

Social Connectedness Scale, Revised

20

6 responses from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree”

Alpha 0.92 [44]

Global health-related quality of life

Quality of Life Index

60

6 responses from “very satisfied” to “very dissatisfied”, or from “very important” to “very unimportant”

Alpha 0.87–0.97 (cancer survivors), 0.92–0.93 (informal caregivers) [45]

Positive affect

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

20

Very slightly or not at all, a little, moderately, quite a bit, and extremely

Alpha 0.87 (positive scale) [46]

Dyadic function

Relationship Assessment Scale

7

5 responses from “low satisfaction” to “high satisfaction”

Alpha 0.86 [47]

Self-compassion

Neff Self-Compassion Scale

26

5 responses from “almost never” to “almost always”

Alpha 0.92 [48, 49]

  1. aPrimary outcome